MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2583924774

Corporations Take Different Approaches to Climate Change

2016· article· en· W2583924774 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueResearch-Technology Management · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnergy
ThématiqueGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésClimate changeDenialPoliticsPolitical scienceGlobal warmingScientific consensusEnvironmental ethicsPolitical economyDevelopment economicsLawSociologyEconomicsPsychologyEcology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The reality of climate change caused by human activity has represented a continuing source of disagreement in US politics, for some time, and it is a factor in the November 2016 elections. But the disagreement hasn't been confined to politicians--major American corporations have taken notably different attitudes to the issue. Much of the media's coverage of the issue has focused on climate change denial by corporate fossil fuel interests, which have joined with political allies to make their cases, but several large companies in a number of fields, most notably the high-tech world, have taken the opposite tack. Not only do they admit the reality of the phenomenon; they also seek to develop and support technologies to mitigate its effects. International organizations have made clear their belief in the reality of human-caused climate change. Two years ago, the Fifth Assessment Report of the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change asserted that warming of Earth's atmosphere and ocean system is unequivocally happening and that it is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the warming observed since 1950. Scientists have largely agreed. Within the past two years, assessments by the US Global Change Research Program and the National Academy of Sciences, for example, have agreed with the UN panel. And in late June, a brief statement to Congress by 31 American scientific societies reaffirmed that consensus. To reduce the risk of the most severe impacts of climate change, greenhouse gas emissions must be substantially reduced, the statement notes. addition, adaptation is necessary to address unavoidable consequences for human health and safety, food security, water availability, and national security, among others. We in the scientific community are prepared to work with you [Congress] on the scientific issues important to your deliberations as you seek to address the challenges of our changing climate. Signing organizations include the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the American Chemical Society, the American Geophysical Union, and the Geological Society of America. At the political level, the governments of the United States, Mexico, and Canada agreed in June to aim at reaching a goal of generating 50 percent of North American electricity from non-carbon sources by 2025. Fossil fuel interests have facilitated some efforts to mitigate climate change by participating in new technological developments. However, one major initiative hit a roadblock in midsummer 2016. A clean coal plan in Kemper, Mississippi, touted by the Obama administration as a futuristic means of reducing the emission of greenhouse gases, came under attack for a series of missteps. The plant, designed to capture, compress, and sell off the carbon dioxide it produced, was already more than two years behind schedule and $2.4 billion over its original $4 billion budget. Then, Southern Company, the plant's owner, became the subject of an investigation by the Securities and Exchange Commission and of lawsuits by local ratepayers, who have alleged fraud. Documents that a whistleblower provided to the New York Times indicate that the company drastically understated the costs and schedule of the project and concealed problems that emerged during the project. More commonly, corporate interests have relied on climate change deniers to delay action on the issue by legal means. In 2010, for example, the commonwealth of Virginia's attorney general Ken Cuccinelli issued a civil investigative demand to the University of Virginia seeking all e-mails and other documents related to research by former faculty member Michael Mann, a climatologist whose work has formed the basis for much of the current understanding of climate change. Cuccinelli's argument: Mann, now at Pennsylvania State University, had misspent state grants on unscientific research. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,432
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,255
Tête enseignante GPT0,346
Écart entre enseignants0,091 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle