Bridge bearing fuse systems for regions with high-magnitude earthquakes at long recurrence intervals
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This paper describes an ongoing experimental and computational program investigating bridge bearing assemblies common in mid-America, to ascertain their effectiveness as seismic fuses and to characterize their component behavior during large displacements of the superstructure. The bearing assemblies considered in the testing program are intended to address seismic risk for regions where the hazard is dictated by infrequent, but large magnitude, seismic events such as may occur in the New Madrid seismic zone near southern Illinois. Test specimens include low-profile fixed bearings, as well as steel-reinforced elastomeric bearings. The elastomeric bearings, some of which include a Teflonon-steel sliding surface, have stiffened L-shaped retainer brackets to restrain transverse response at service load levels. The bearing components being studied are intended to ensure predictable, elastic response for service loading, including small seismic events. However, for larger seismic events, mechanical response of these bridge bearings will transition through highly nonlinear mechanisms that require a refined behavioral understanding, including post-yield deformations and fracture of selected steel components in the fixed bearings, high shear strain response in the elastomer, and sliding along predetermined interfaces. The experimental program is evaluating potential fuse mechanisms and component behavior that will then be implemented in computational models of complete bridges to assess global system response. The research will develop comprehensive test data upon which to base bridge design guidelines for proportioning fuse components to provide reliable service performance, as well as a passive, quasi-isolated global response during a major seismic event. This design dichotomy of bridge response ensures seismic safety (i.e., prevention of span loss) while maintaining appropriate fiscal responsibility consistent with the nature of seismic risk in regions where major earthquakes are expected to occur only at long recurrence intervals. 1 Graduate Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign, Urbana, IL 61801 2 Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801 3 Associate Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801 4 Assistant Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801 Proceedings of the 9th U.S. National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering Compte Rendu de la 9ieme Conference Nationale Americaine et 10ieme Conference Canadienne de Genie Parasismique July 25-29, 2010, Toronto, Ontario, Canada • Paper No
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle