MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2584566446 · doi:10.1182/blood.v118.21.4101.4101

Outcome of Children Who Experience Disease Relapse Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies,

2011· article· en· W2584566446 sur OpenAlexaff
Rajinder Bajwa, Sandeep Soni, Tal Schechter, Adam Gassas, John Doyle, India Sisler, Kamar Godder, David Tatman, Stephen Rumelhart, Jennifer Domm, Haydar Frangoul

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineHematopoietic stem cell transplantationTransplantationInternal medicineJuvenile myelomonocytic leukemiaLeukemiaMyeloid leukemiaOncologyPediatricsStem cellHaematopoiesis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 4101 Introduction: According to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Research (CIBMTR) data, relapse accounts for 41% of deaths after matched sibling donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and 34% of deaths after unrelated donor HSCT. Overall long term survival of 25–30% has been reported in patients who relapse after HSCT. Most of these data are from adult studies. In a recent study, survival following a second allogeneic HSCT ranged from 25–50%. There are limited data on the treatment outcome of children who relapse after an allogeneic HSCT for hematological malignancies. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study was done with the primary objective to examine the incidence and outcome of children who experience relapse after allogeneic HSCT. Patients with a primary diagnosis of acute lymphatic leukemia (ALL), acute or chronic myeloid leukemia (AML or CML), juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia (JMML), biphenotypic leukemia (BL), acute undifferentiated leukemia (AUL), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were included. After IRB approval, data was collected from review of the medical charts of patients who underwent HSCT at 5 institutions across North America. Results: Data on 532 patients was analyzed; these included 328 males and 204 females. These included ALL (n=254), AML (n=187), MDS (n=35), CML (n=26), JMML (n=3), sAML (n=12), Biphenotypic leukemia (n=10), AUL (n=3) and 1 each with APL and secondary ALL. The median age at HSCT was 9.7 years (range 0.44 to 24.98). Four hundred and fifty (85%) of the 532 patients were in complete remission (CR) at the time of HSCT. Five hundred and fifteen (97%) underwent a myeloablative (MA) HSCT and 16 (3%) had a non-myeloablative (NMA) HSCT. Total body irradiation (TBI) was part of the conditioning therapy in 334 (63%) while 198 (37%) had chemotherapy based regimens. Standard graft versus host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis with calcineurin inhibitors and methotrexate was used in 76% of patients. Grade 1–2 acute GvHD developed in 180 (34%) of patients and 82 (15%) had grade 3–4 acute GvHD. Chronic GvHD was seen in 118 (22%) cases with half having extensive chronic GvHD. After HSCT, 85 (16%) patients died of transplant related complications at 1 year, with infection as the leading (26%) cause of death. The 2, 5 and 10 year overall survival for the entire group was 58.5%, 46% and 44% respectively. Following HSCT, 131 (25%) patients relapsed at a median duration of 7.7 months (range 0.6 to 66.4 months). Of the 131 patients who relapsed 80 (61%) received salvage therapy, 39(30%) did not get any therapy and data were not available for another 12 (9%) patients. Salvage therapy included a combination of withdrawal of immunosuppression, ALL or AML re-induction therapy, or other remission inducing agents, clofarabine, and/or donor lymphocyte infusions (n=22). After salvage therapy 46 (57.5%) patients achieved CR, 26 (32.5%) had no response, 3 (4%) partial response, 2 unknown and 4 (5%) had marrow aplasia and no recovery of counts. Sixty-three (48%) of the relapsed patients underwent a second HSCT: 26 (41%) received a MA, 21 (33%) NMA, 3 (5%) with no conditioning and in 13 (21%) conditioning therapy was unknown. Nearly 22 different conditioning regimens were used for the second HSCT. After the second HSCT 19 (41%) patients died because of transplant related mortality (TRM) and 24 patients died because of relapse. Seventeen (27%) patients are alive and disease free. Conclusions: Relapse remains a major complication following allogeneic HSCT for hematologic malignancies. Our data shows that patients who relapse after HSCT have poor prognosis. In our study 30 different salvage therapies were used for these patients. Currently there is no standard acceptable salvage therapy and most cooperative group or industry sponsored clinical trials exclude patients who underwent HSCT. In addition there are no standard conditioning regimens designed specifically for the second HSCT, which could contribute to the high TRM seen during second HSCT. There is urgent need to develop prospective clinical trials to better understand the optimal therapy for this group of patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,005

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,282
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→