Trade unions and Euroscepticism: The crisis of 'social Europe'
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The signing of the Treaty of Maastricht and the transformation from the European Community to the European Union can be regarded as a turning point after which opposition to integration (now named as 'Euro-scepticism') became 'embedded'.The hitherto 'permissive consensus' which rendered opposition to integration as marginal and residual began to break down and was replaced by a more contested process in which opposition became a more pervasive and enduring, if not permanent, response to integration (Usherwood & Startin, 2013).However, it can be argued that for trade unionism, the inclusion of a social chapter in the Maastricht Treaty marked, not the emergence of 'Euro-scepticism', but its retreat in the face of a new wave of 'Euro-enthusiasm'.This was based around the new mobilising project of 'Social Europe' that filled the 'vacuum of inspirational ideology' following the collapse of communism, the crisis of social democracy and the subsequent triumph of neoliberalism (Hyman, 2003: 3-4).This 'Euro-philic' turn was epitomised by the European Trade Union Confederation (ETUC) which has been its elite vanguard.However, even the ETUC began to take a more critical approach to integration as the social dimension stalled in the 2000s and this has been accompanied by increasing popular dissent amongst workers who have borne the brunt of the Euro-crisis (Taylor & Mathers, 2004).In this context, the unions have become increasingly marginalized following the EU's welldocumented turn to neoliberalism, the post-Lisbon hardening of 'ordo-liberalism', the turn to austerity in the context of the Eurozone crisis and the post-2009 clash of legal hierarchies illustrated in the Laval-Viking-Rffert cases.There are, however, marked divisions both within and between European trade unions in respect to the most appropriate response to the dynamics of European integration (see Hyman, 2010).This chapter will trace and explore the increasingly critical orientations of European trade unions to European integration in order to highlight the complex, contested and multifaceted nature of Euro-scepticism amongst European trade unions.In the next section, we present an overview of the main developments and dynamics that have contributed to a growing disillusionment of European trade union towards European integration.We then provide a series of case studies that highlight the growing negative orientation to European integration and the institutional dynamics of the EU amongst trade unions in the UK, France, Sweden and at the European level.We conclude by deconstructing the concept of Euroscepticism as applied to trade unions and present a typology of the divergent orientations of European unions to questions of European integration. Trade unions and Euroscepticism: An OverviewThe Euroscepticism literature which developed from the 1990s focused on political parties and public opinion and only recently has it become interested in civil society (Leconte, 2010).Research specifically on Eurosceptic discourse or campaigning by trade unions is relatively rare which tends to reflect the opportunity structure in which unions operated during periods of European institution-building.In the context of a decline of oppositional ideologies within the labour movement, a policy environment developed that was friendly to 'social partnership' and this encouraged a pro-European belief structure that corresponded to the automatic internationalism of the trade union ideational repertoire.From the beginning, the leaders of Europe's main (non-Communist) union confederations were ideologically committed to European integration as a touchstone of democracy.The legacy of WWII and, in the context of the Cold War, these unions became 'professional Europeans' (Gumbrell-McCormick & Hyman, 2013:179) and were co-opted willingly into the project of constructing a European economic community.In the 1980s, the establishment of the Single Market offered trade unions the opportunity to contribute to the future development of
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».