Patterns of Duck Community Composition in the Prairie Pothole Region of Canada: Effects of Climate and Land Use
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Shifts in the duck community composition in the Canadian Prairie Pothole Region (PPR) have been evident over the past 25 years for reasons that are not entirely clear. Several duck species have increased in abundance whereas others have remained stable, or have declined, despite shifts in agricultural land use from annually tilled cropland to more pasture and haylands, and increases in spring pond counts since 2008. I considered three main hypotheses that could account for species-specific changes in duck abundances within the Canadian PPR; (i) redistribution; (ii) climate and (iii) land use. First, I examined whether shifts in populations of eleven duck species (seven dabbling ducks, four diving ducks) could be due to redistribution from other regions either to or from the Canadian PPR. I found no support for this hypothesis for any species. Trends and timing of changes in duck abundances were generally similar and coincident in US prairie, Canadian PPR and southern boreal forest biomes in all species. To test for effects of variations in climate, I used >20,000 nesting records for eight upland nesting duck species and related the timing of nesting and subsequent nest success to annual variations in spring temperature and moisture conditions. Furthermore, I tested for the relative importance of antecedent winter climate on nesting activities using winter El Niño Southern Oscillation indices. In general, nesting occurred earlier in warmer springs and following warmer, wetter winters. However, the magnitude of responses varied, indicating species-specific responses to variations in climate. Early nesting was the most influential factor for increasing nest survival and because timing advanced following wetter winters, this may provide a cross-seasonal mechanism for how winter climate can subsequently impact offspring recruitment in species like mallard (Anas platyrhynchos). To evaluate the land use change hypothesis, I related changes in duck abundances to changes in ponds and upland habitat composition using unique monitoring data collected in the PPR in 1985 and 2011. I used data from 42 transects distributed across the PPR to first characterize changes in upland habitat and then relate these changes to abundances of four common dabbling duck species. Pond abundances increased between ~1985 and ~2011, and cropland was converted to tame grass (i.e., pastureland). Changes in abundances of mallard and northern shoveler (A. clypeata) were primarily driven by changes in pond abundances. In blue-winged teal (A. discors), abundances of breeding birds increased more rapidly than other species and there was some evidence that conversion of cropland to tame grass resulted in greater teal abundances. Change in abundance of northern pintail (A. acuta) was not related to changes in ponds or upland habitat conditions. Overall, I found no evidence for the redistribution hypothesis; however, I did find evidence for species-specific responses to both variations in climate and changes in land use. This implies that species respond differently to various drivers and may be a partial explanation for observed differences in population trajectories. Although further research should seek to explain increases in certain species over others, my work provides insights into potential species-specific population drivers. This information is critical in informing managers about possible areas where conservation actions could be implemented to sustain waterfowl populations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».