MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2585127179 · doi:10.1182/blood.v116.21.961.961

Complete Remissions with Brentuximab Vedotin (SGN-35) in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Systemic Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma

2010· article· en· W2585127179 sur OpenAlexaff
Andrei R. Shustov, Ranjana H. Advani, Pauline Brice, Nancy L. Bartlett, Joseph D. Rosenblatt, Tim Illidge, Jeffrey Matous, Radhakrishnan Ramchandren, Michelle A. Fanale, Joseph M. Connors, Yin Yang, Eric L. Sievers, Dana A. Kennedy, Barbara Pro

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensBC Cancer Agency
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBrentuximab vedotinMedicineAnaplastic large-cell lymphomaCD30TolerabilityInternal medicineOncologyAntibody-drug conjugateLymphomaGastroenterologyAdverse effectImmunologyAntibody

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 961 Background: Systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (sALCL) is a CD30-expressing malignancy comprising approximately 2–3% of all cases of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35) delivers the highly potent antimicrotubule agent monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) to CD30-positive malignant cells by binding specifically to CD30 on the cell surface and releasing MMAE inside the cell via lysosomal degradation. Binding of MMAE to tubulin disrupts the microtubule network within the cell, induces cell cycle arrest, and results in apoptotic death of the CD30-expressing tumor cell. In phase 1 studies, brentuximab vedotin demonstrated good tolerability and notable antitumor activity in patients with relapsed or refractory sALCL: 6 of 7 treated patients achieved complete remissions (CR). Methods: A phase 2, single-arm, multicenter study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed or refractory sALCL. Brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg was administered every 3 weeks as a 30-minute outpatient IV infusion for up to 16 cycles of treatment. Determination of antitumor efficacy was based on objective response assessments according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Results: A total of 58 patients were treated in this study; interim data are presented for the first 30 treated patients. 53% of patients were female and median age was 55 years (range 14–71). The majority of patients had ALK-1 negative tumor (70%, or n=21) and 4 patients (13%) had bone marrow involvement at baseline. The median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 2 (range 1–6) and 8 patients (27%) had failed previous autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (SCT). 19 patients (63%) had primary refractory disease, and 16 patients (53%) had not responded to the most recent prior therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) by investigator assessment was 87%; 57% of patients achieved a CR (n=17) and 30% of patients achieved a partial remission (PR; n=9). The remaining patients had stable disease (n=3) or were not evaluable for response (n=1). Similar proportions of ALK-1 negative and ALK-1 positive patients achieved CR and PR. Reduction in tumor burden was observed in 97% of patients. The median time to objective response was 6 weeks (range 5–12) and the duration of objective responses currently range from 4–36 weeks, with responses ongoing in 18 patients. B symptoms resolved in 9 of 10 patients (90%) who had these symptoms at baseline. After achieving a CR with brentuximab vedotin, 10 patients (33%) went on to receive an autologous or allogeneic SCT. The most common (>20%) adverse events (AEs) of any grade were nausea (47%), diarrhea (40%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (40%), pyrexia (33%), dyspnea (30%), fatigue (27%), insomnia (23%), and neutropenia (23%). Grade 3/4 AEs considered related to brentuximab vedotin observed in >1 patient were neutropenia (17%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (13%), diarrhea (7%), and anemia (7%); no treatment-related Grade 5 events were observed. 7 patients (23%) discontinued treatment due to an AE. Conclusion: In this interim analysis of 30 patients with relapsed or refractory sALCL, the investigator-assessed ORR was 87% and the CR rate was 57%. Brentuximab vedotin treatment was associated with manageable AEs; the most common in the study were nausea, diarrhea, and peripheral sensory neuropathy. The rate of complete remissions observed thus far in this study with single-agent treatment suggests that brentuximab vedotin has potential for the treatment of sALCL. Results of the independent assessment of response for all patients, duration of response, progression-free survival, and updated safety data will be presented at the meeting. Disclosures: Shustov: Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding, Steering Committee member. Off Label Use: The clinical trial uses an investigational drug, brentuximab vedotin (SGN-35). Advani:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Brice:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Bartlett:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Rosenblatt:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Illidge:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy; Biogen Idec: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Matous:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Millennium: Speakers Bureau; Cephalon: Speakers Bureau. Ramchandren:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Fanale:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Connors:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Yang:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment. Sievers:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kennedy:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pro:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,207
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations37
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207