Tonsillectomy in a Patient with Type 3 Von Willebrand Disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Type 3 Von Willebrand Disease (VWD) is a rare autosomal recessive bleeding disorder characterized by a complete deficiency of von Willebrand factor (VWF) and markedly reduced levels of FVIII, which confers a severe bleeding phenotype. Conventional management is with plasma-derived von Willebrand factor / FVIII concentrates. These products do not fully correct the bleeding diathesis, for several possible reasons: (a) platelets remain deficient in VWF; (b) subendothelial matrix remains deficient in VWF; and (c) available products lack the highest molecular weight VWF multimers. Because of the low prevalence of type 3 VWD, reports on surgical procedures are scarce. We reviewed the literature and identified one case report of a patient with type 3 VWD who underwent tonsillectomy (Alusi et al. 1995). That case was complicated by major intra-operative bleeding as well as prolonged hemorrhage in the two weeks following surgery, despite factor replacement with concentrate, cryoprecipitate, platelet transfusion and tranexamic acid. We report on the management of a patient with type 3 VWD undergoing a tonsillectomy, which demonstrates the importance of local measures in hemostatic control. Case: A 29 year old woman with Type 3 VWD (baseline VWF:Ag 4 IU/dL, VWF:RCoF <5 IU/dL, FVIII 1 IU/dL) had a 2 year history of recurrent tonsillar hemorrhage despite regular prophylaxis with plasma-derived VWF concentrate (Humate-P®). Each episode occurred in the absence of trauma or infection, and bleeding was difficult to control despite Humate-P and tranexamic acid. Lee et al. (2010) have previously reported that VWD is a cause of spontaneous tonsillar hemorrhage. Due to the recurrent nature of the bleeding episodes, a tonsillectomy was recommended. In preparation for the surgical procedure, we performed pharmacokinetic studies, which revealed a yield of VWF activity of 2.35IU/dL per U/kg and a half-life of VWF activity of 8.8 hours. We administered an initial loading dose of 63IU/kg (RCoF) of Humate-P preoperatively, achieving a VWF activity level (by latex agglutination: HemosIL vWF activity, Instrumentation Laboratories) of 126%. The tonsillectomy was uneventful, and the estimated blood loss intra-operatively was <50 mL. Surgical hemostasis was augmented by administration of tranexamic acid 1000mg intravenously pre-operatively and by continuous infusion intra-operatively, as well as 5 mL of fibrin sealant (Tisseel) administered to each tonsillar bed. A dose of Humate-P of 22.6 IU/kg was given post-operatively, and subsequent doses of 11.3 IU/kg were given q 4 hourly to maintain trough VWF activity of approximately 100IU/dL. Post-operative doses of tranexamic acid were omitted due to a transcribing error until day #3. On day #4 the Humate P dosing was reduced to 11.5U/kg q6h, which maintained trough VWF activity levels of approximately 50%. No bleeding occurred until post-operative day #9, when the eschar at the wound side detached. Bleeding continued despite re-bolus of Humate-P (23IU/kg) followed by resumption of q4h dosing, administration of tranexamic acid topically in the form of a 5% solution in addition to systemic administration, and application of topical silver nitrate. Hypotension transiently developed and the hemoglobin fell from 106 to 66g/L, requiring a return to the operating room. Further application of fibrin sealant promptly secured hemostasis. Conclusion: Surgery in a patient with type 3 VWD requires careful planning and collaboration between hematologists with expertise in bleeding disorders, the bleeding disorders nursing staff and surgical team. This case highlights the importance of monitoring for an extended period post-operatively, and demonstrates that bleeding can occur despite maintaining adequate VWF levels. Topical measures such as fibrin sealant play a key role in controlling bleeding in this context. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».