Factor VIII Levels Measured at the Time of Diagnosis of Acute Idiopathic Venous Thromboembolism Are Higher Then When Measured Six-Months Post Diagnosis.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Thrombophilia screens are performed frequently in persons with a history of acute venous thromboembolism especially in those for whom the etiology is unprovoked or idiopathic. The optimal timing of the thrombophilia screen is controversial. Elevation of Factor VIII levels are a more recently described thrombophilia that is felt to be hereditary, however, the exact mode of inheritance is not certain. Factor VIII is also known to be elevated as an acute phase reactant. The accuracy of assessing Factor VIII levels at the time of diagnosis of acute venous thromboembolism is not known. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a difference in Factor VIII levels measured at the time of diagnosis of acute venous thromboembolism as compared to six months later while patients are on oral anticoagulation. Methods: Consecutive patients with a first episode of idiopathic acute venous thromboembolism were eligible. Patients were excluded if they were <18 years of age or had already been started on oral anticoagulants. Plasma was collected within 48 hours of diagnosis in.105 mmol sodium citrate, double spun at 1,500 G and frozen at −70 Celsius for batch testing. Factor VIII levels were assessed with a three point assay on an ACL 9000 (Beckman Coulter, Mississauga). A seven-point reference curve was used for all factor assays. Linear regression showed r2 values were always > 0.99 on calibration lines. Controls at two levels, 1.00 U/mL normal pooled plasma and 0.32 U/mL were run with all assays. All patients were treated with dalteparin at 200u/kg sc daily for 5–7 days and simultaneously initiated on warfarin for six months. At the six-month point repeat Factor VIII assessments were performed while the patients were still receiving oral anticoagulation with warfarin. Results: There were 61 patients (37 male) and the mean age was 50.4 years (18–85 years). Thirty patients had deep vein thrombosis, 23 pulmonary embolism and 8 patients had both diagnoses. The patients’ Factor VIII levels at baseline and six months were compared. At baseline the mean Factor VIII level was 1.77 units/ml and at six months it was 1.59 units/ml. The 95% confidence interval for difference in means was 0.04 – 0.32. These results were statistically significant, (paired t-test p=.01). Conclusion: This study confirms that caution should be used in interpreting Factor VIII levels drawn as part of a thrombophilia screen at the time of diagnosis of acute idiopathic venous thromboembolism. Factor VIII levels will be lower six-months later when patients are stable on oral anticoagulation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».