Clonal Evolution Predicts Poor Prognosis in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia and Is Possibly a Worse Prognostic Factor Than 17p Deletion: A Population Based Cohort study of FISH Testing in British Columbia, Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 1401 Introduction: CLL has been considered a genetically stable disease; however, recent evidence suggests that clonal evolution (CE) occurs at a higher rate than previously known. The clinical significance of CE in terms of CLL progression, requirement for and response to therapy (tx), overall (OS) and treatment-free survival (TFS) is not clear. The relationship between CE and tx and to the pathophysiology of CLL is also currently unknown. There is a need for improved understanding of CE in CLL and its possible impact on prognosis, tx, and outcomes. We performed a population-based analysis of all patients (pts) referred for CLL fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing in BC, Canada who had 32 FISH studies done to determine the incidence of CE and its association with clinical outcomes. Methods: FISH testing has been standard of care for CLL pts in BC since 2004 and includes minimally evaluation of 4 prognostically significant recurrent cytogenetic (CG) abnormalities (abn): deletion 13q (13q-), deletion 11q (11q-), trisomy 12 (+12) and 17p- as well as IGH abn in a pt subset. Complete clinical and pathological data has been systematically retrospectively collected on all pts who have had CLL FISH testing performed. We included all pts who had 32 sequential CLL FISH tests 33 months apart from 2004-Dec 2011. Primary endpoints were (a) incidence of CE and (b) overall survival. Results: Of 861 pts screened, 134 met inclusion criteria. 21 pts (16%) had CE with median (med) age 57 yrs (range 45–80) at dx and 63 yrs (49–83) at time CE detected; 16 (77%) were male; Rai stage was low in 7 pts (33%), int in 11 (52%) and high in 3 (14%). At med follow-up of 7 yrs (1–37), 19/21 (91%) of CE pts and 99/113 (88%) non-CE pts received tx. Tx included nucleoside analog (NA) in 3 (14%) vs 23 (20%) pts, NA + rituximab (R) in 8 (38%) vs 53 (47%) pts, chlorambucil in 5 (24%) vs 14 (12%) pts and cyclophosphamide based in 3 (14%) vs 8 (7%) pts in the CE and non-CE groups respectively. 9 (43%) CE vs 36 (32%) non-CE pts underwent stem cell transplant (HSCT). 2 untx pts developed CE. CG abns detected on initial FISH test, classified by Dohner hierarchy were: 13q- (32%), +12 (22%), 17p- (12%), 11q- (11%), none of the 4 abns (23%). A total of 28 abns defining CE were detected in the 21pts and the most common were: 11q- (10 pts, 48%), 13q (10 pts, 47%). Predictors of CE on univariate analysis included lymphocyte count at dx (OR 1.01 per increase in lymphs by 1 ×109/L, 95% CI 1.00–1.02, p=0.048) and presence of 13q- at 1st FISH testing (OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.14–0.98, p=0.047); however these were not predictive of CE on multivariate analysis (MVA) after controlling for covariates (p=0.13 and p=0.19 respectively). No other baseline characteristics were predictive for CE including gender (p=0.31), age (p=0.38), WBC at dx (p=0.07), and CD38 positivity (p=0.56). OS was markedly reduced in pts who developed CE compared to those who did not: HR 5.9, median OS 8.2 yrs vs not reached, p=<0.001 (Fig 1). On MVA, CE retained its negative effect with HR 6.3 (95% CI 2.2–17.6), p<0.001, after adjusting for sex, age, Rai stage and baseline CG abn. Conclusion: CE is more common than previously recognized and carries a poor prognosis. In this study pts with CE fared worse than those with 17p-. OS of pts with CE in this cohort is in keeping with the med OS for 11q- and 17p- reported in the literature, indicating that presence of CE signifies a new poor prognostic indicator. These observations should prompt FISH testing in all pts at diagnosis and relevant time points in follow-up, such as with change in clinical behaviour and prior to new tx. Furthermore, as CE was thought to be tx related, the fact that 2 untx pts developed CE is a novel finding and provides further evidence of the clinical importance of CE in CLL. It is unclear whether CE pts should be considered for more aggressive tx, including HSCT. Results of our study provide a better understanding of the relationship of CE and disease progression in CLL, allowing for improved pt management and tx of this clinically heterogeneous and incurable disease. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».