MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2586982933 · doi:10.20381/ruor-19785

Mending our nets: Toward a feminist vision of redemption and Labrador in dialogue with the Newfoundland fishery

2008· dissertation· en· W2586982933 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Darlene Brewer

Notice bibliographique

RevueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2008
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFisheryGeographyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This thesis looks toward the construction of a contextual understanding of redemption in light of women's experiences in the Newfoundland and Labrador 1 (NL) fishery. Specifically, I consider how we might speak about redemption in a way that is meaningful to their experiences in the midst of the 1990s fishery closure in the province. With the closure of the fishery there has been much loss in the way of personal and cultural identity, belief and way of life. There have been many economic, social, ecological and cultural impacts on women and men and the whole ecological system of the fishery. Women's experiences in the wake of the impact of the closure of the NL fishery make a significant contribution to a contextual understanding of redemptive hope. The Christian language of redemption is appropriate for an understanding of how we speak, theologically, about social and ecological hope. Redemption is embodied in an earthly hope, given by God and embodied in action toward the building of communities of solidarity and an ethical approach rooted in the here and now of people's everyday lives. Redemption also involves an eschatological horizon where the Mystery of God's creative and redemptive love is beyond our imagining. This promise is made known to us historically through our lived experience. Both dimensions of redemption are relevant to a construction of redemption in light of women's experiences. In the NL fishery context, the language of redemptive hope is especially pertinent in light of women's experiences of personal and community loss and devastation. This devastation is also ecological because of foreign, and, to a lesser extent, domestic overfishing that has led to the closure of the fishery and the almost non-renewability of a species---northern cod. Fundamentally, how we speak about our salvation as human beings is inextricably linked with the whole ecological well-being of our local and global communities. Theological discourse, especially around salvation and our human participation in it, fails to have meaning if it is not directly connected with our earthly, historical realities, especially in relation to experiences in times of crisis. I have chosen to focus solely on insights from women's experiences in the fishery because women's experiences as fish plantworkers and fishers are rarely highlighted. From the methodologies of feminist and liberation theologies, an experience of redemption or liberation begins with the action of God in the history of those most excluded in our societies, whose voices have not been heard. Ecofeminist theologians explore theological constructions from ecological perspectives, citing the earth itself as our place of salvation. There are many theologians who have written about redemption from liberation and ecofeminist perspectives. I will draw from three theologians---Edward Schillebeeckx, Ivone Gebara and Rosemary Radford Ruether---to consider how they speak about a socially-engaged redemption. In dialogue with these theologians' insights on redemption, I use NL women's narratives, from the fields of sociology and health, to consider women's voices during the years immediately following the closure of the fishery. Then, I consider these narratives and what they are saying theologically, individually and collectively. Specifically, I choose to articulate an understanding of redemption out of the particular context of women's lives in a fishery closure. It is my finding that these women's narratives, in dialogue with theologians' insights, contribute to a new way of speaking about redemption for today. I hope this thesis will contribute to new ways of speaking about NL women's experiences in the fishery and the fishery itself and consider new avenues for discourse on contextual, lived experiences of redemptive hope. It is a contextual understanding of this particular context and as such is one avenue of bringing the complex notion of redemption into view. It does not intend to offer a comprehensive treatment of redemption. In the context of the NL fishery I speak about the possibility of community building and ecological sustainability. These are two major components of a vision of redemptive living in the NL fishery. By taking these women's experiences into account and the reality of the ecological community of the whole fishery, I consider our redemptive hope from the perspective of interdependence of human with other life. With this development of a contextual theology around redemption in the NL fishery, I also reconstruct an understanding of the person of Jesus Christ and God born out of dialogue with theologians and women's experiences in the fishery. This new theological understanding of redemption involves the cultivation of resistance and resilience as modes of redemptive living. This is the major finding of the thesis and shapes a contextual, earth-centred, creation-focussed theology of redemption. 1In this thesis, I will refer to Newfoundland and Labrador in its abbreviated form as NL except when citing another source.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,307
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,617

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0430,076
Communication savante0,0140,010
Science ouverte0,0030,011
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,010
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,076
Tête enseignante GPT0,396
Écart entre enseignants0,320 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueuO Research (University of Ottawa)Même sujetIndigenous Studies and EcologyTravaux en français237 207