CD44 Antibody Mediated Amelioration of Murine ITP: Evidence for a Similar Strain Dependent FcγRIIB Requirement As Compared to Ivig
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 1084 We have previously demonstrated that monoclonal antibodies to the CD44 antigen can ameliorate murine ITP as successfully as IVIg. We have also shown that, similar to IVIg, these antibodies do not require expression of the neonatal Fcγ receptor FcRn. Unlike IVIg, however, CD44 antibodies do not require the Fc portion to function in the murine ITP model. A lack of requirement for the Fc region of CD44 antibodies would indicate that Fcγ receptors should not be necessary for antibody function, but CD44 antibodies do not ameliorate ITP in FcγRIIB deficient mice (B6;129S-Fcgr2btm1Ttk/J). Recent data from some groups have suggested that IVIg can in fact ameliorate murine ITP in the absence of FcγRIIB, depending on the background strain of the mouse. These data cast doubt on the simplistic view that IVIg ameliorates murine ITP by upregulating macrophage FcγRIIB expression. The requirement for the expression of the inhibitory IgG receptor FcγRIIB has been a prominent theory as to how IVIg ameliorates ITP. Similar to IVIg, the CD44 antibody KM114 does not function in B6;129S-Fcgr2btm1Ttk/J FcγRIIB deficient mice. Another IVIg product which has ameliorative effects similar to IVIg but appears to function via a different mechanism is anti-D. We have previously shown that IVIg and a monoclonal antibody with “anti-D like” activity, TER-119, can successfully ameliorate thrombocytopenia in a murine model of ITP. In contrast to KM114 and IVIg, TER-119 is fully functional in B6;129S-Fcgr2btm1Ttk/J mice. To further characterize the therapeutic CD44 antibody KM114, we have analysed KM114 function in FcγRIIB deficient mice on 3 different backgrounds. Specifically, mice were pretreated with nothing, 50 ug KM114, 50 mg IVIg, or 50 ug TER-119 thirty min prior to administration of the anti-platelet antibody MWReg30. Here, we have confirmed that TER-119, but not KM114 or IVIg, successfully ameliorates murine ITP in B6;129S-Fcgr2btm1Ttk/J mice. These mice are not fully congenic, and have been reported to be approximately a 50:50 mix of B6 and 129S4 (Leontyev, et. al Blood. 31;119(22):5261-4). To investigate whether or not KM114 required the presence of FcγRIIB in mice from different backgrounds, we next employed B6.129S4-Fcgr2btm1TtK N12 FcγRIIB deficient mice, which, unlike B6;129S-Fcgr2btm1Ttk/J mice, are congenic on the B6 background. KM114 and IVIg were both effective in treating thrombocytopenia in these mice. TER-119 was also effective, as expected. To further explore these findings, we next employed FcγRIIB deficient mice which are congenic on the BALB/C background, C.129S4(B6)-Fcgr2btm1TtK/cAnNTac N12 mice. Again, we found that KM114, IVIg and TER-119 were all effective in treating thrombocytopenia in these mice. As KM114 functions in congenic B6.129S4-Fcgr2btm1TtK N12 and C.129S4(B6)-Fcgr2btm1TtK/cAnNTac N12 mice, but not in mixed background B6;129S-Fcgr2btm1Ttk/J mice, these data suggest that rather than FcγRIIB expression being necessary, it may be the mouse background genes that affect KM114's ability to function. Further experiments using mice of different genetic backgrounds may assist in understanding these findings. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».