MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2587455619 · doi:10.1097/01.eem.0000512774.01399.d7

Diversity Matters

2017· article· en· W2587455619 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueEmergency Medicine News · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTransgenderLimelightGender diversityDiversity (politics)Gender identityIdentity (music)TranssexualPsychologyMedicineGerontologyGender studiesSociologySocial psychologyPolitical scienceLawManagement

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

transgender, discrimination: Caitlyn Jenner, formerly Bruce Jenner, brought the limelight to transgender issues last year during her transition.FigureFigureFigureFigure“Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly.” — Martin Luther King, Jr., letter from a Birmingham Jail, AL, 1963 Transgender patients, because they are more likely to lack adequate health insurance and access to basic medical care, are also more likely to need emergency medical services, but their fear of discrimination and prior negative experiences also make them more likely to avoid seeking care. One study reported these poor experiences as high as 21 percent for all emergency department encounters for the transgender community in Ontario, Canada. (Ann Emerg Med 2014;63[6]:713.) The authors attributed bad encounters to health providers' lack of experience with transgender patients and insulting behavior. These issues place transgender patients at risk from inadequate emergency care, and merits the need for emergency departments to place heavier emphasis on improving the experience of transgender patients. Transgender individuals, those whose gender identity differs from their sex, is a subgroup of the gender nonconforming community, individuals who do not follow other people's ideas or stereotypes about their looks and behaviors based on their sex. Transgender topics have been covered more in the news and on social media in recent years, and efforts to destigmatize the transgender community have been supported by research suggesting that genetic variations, hormones, and brain structures were causes of disharmony between gender identity and phenotypic sex. (Gynecol Endocrinol 2004;19[6]:301.) This research also suggests that gender identity is not a dichotomous male or female designation, and argues that it may be a trait that lies along a spectrum. Society's use of physical characteristics to define gender identity can lead to emotional distress for those who disagree with this definition. For some individuals, this distress leads to gender dysphoria, a new DSM-V term aimed at eliminating the stigma attached to the former term, gender identity disorder. The psychiatric and medical conditions associated with the transgender community are just as important to understand as the conditions associated with other minority populations. This population also has a higher rate of suicide, potentially related to their higher rate of anxiety and depression. Unfortunately, these patients are also more likely to be victims of hate crimes, sexual/physical assault, and intimate partner violence. (Ann Emerg Med 2015;66[4]:417.) All of this information means transgender patients are more likely to need emergency medical services. Building Trust The first step toward improving the transgender patient's experience is to educate emergency physicians and staff on issues pertaining to their health. Studies have shown that a barrier to providing adequate care is physicians' lack of knowledge on specific gender nonconforming medical issues. That study from Ontario, Canada, reported that 54 percent of transgender patients had to educate their physicians on transgender issues. This void in knowledge can dismantle the patient's trust in health care. Emergency departments can remedy this by including gender nonconforming topics in their cultural competency curriculum, such as paying attention to laws surrounding single-sex bathrooms, health insurance, and spousal rights and how they may influence patient encounters. Emergency departments can also consider recruiting and hiring physicians and staff from the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGTBQ) community to show the gender nonconforming population their commitment to diversity and inclusion. These efforts should also address prehospital care and be supported by the greater hospital administration, working toward creating a safe space to treat transgender individuals and discuss social and medical issues affecting these patients. Improving the emergency department encounter for the transgender community will not be an easy task. Some embrace the conversations and changes, but others may not fully engage in the movement due to personal beliefs. There will also be resistance because the rights of the transgender community are wrapped up in national and state legislation, which may limit the changes an emergency department can make. Regardless of the personal convictions of emergency physicians and government regulations, emergency departments must address the factors that lead to poor patient experiences among transgender patients. Ignoring the deficits in emergency health care delivery to transgender patients will only set a precedent to ignore deficits in care for other at-risk minority groups. Share this article on Twitter and Facebook. Access the links in EMN by reading this on our website or in our free iPad app, both available at www.EM-News.com. Comments? Write to us at [email protected].

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,339
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0480,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,119
Tête enseignante GPT0,439
Écart entre enseignants0,320 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle