Donor Chip Causes Donor-Derived Clonal Hematopoiesis As an Early Complication of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) involves the transfer of healthy donor hematopoietic cells, including hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and mature immune effector cells, to recipients with high-risk hematologic malignancies. The success of HSCT is fundamentally dependent on engraftment of normal donor-derived hematopoiesis. Rarely, donor-derived cells undergo transformation to myeloid leukemia as a late complication of HSCT (donor cell leukemia, DCL), a process linked in some cases to pre-existing mutations in donor hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). In healthy older adults, HSC mutations can cause clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP), which is associated with increased risk of hematologic malignancy and an increased risk of all-cause mortality. Among donors over age 40, the frequency of donor CHIP can be estimated to be 5 to 20-fold higher than the frequency of donor cell leukemia, suggesting that non-leukemic endpoints of donor derived clonality may be more prevalent and consequential than previously recognized. Methods We performed targeted next generation sequencing in patients who developed peripheral cytopenias or myeloid neoplasms in the context of 100% donor cell chimerism after allogeneic HSCT. We also prospectively sequenced potential donors who had abnormal CBC parameters, including WBC differential and RBC indices. To determine whether the mutations detected in recipients were of donor derivation, and to assess clonal evolution over time, we performed ultra-deep genotyping at 30,000-100,000X or droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) in the donor stem cell product and serial post-SCT samples. Results We identified four allogeneic SCT recipients with 100% chimerism who met inclusion criteria, two with late-onset hematologic malignancy (latency 23 and 10 years) and two with progressive cytopenias but no evidence of hematologic malignancy on bone marrow examination (latency 18 and 13 months). In each of these patients, sequencing of bone marrow or peripheral blood specimens revealed at least one somatic mutation (SF3B1 K666Q; U2AF1 S34F; DNMT3A T868N; DNMT3A Q356X) that could be used to assess the possibility of donor derivation. In all patients, we identified at least one mutation present in both the diagnostic post-HSCT recipient sample and the pre-HSCT banked donor stem cell product. Figure 1 shows post-HSCT clonal evolution from one case. In another case, we evaluated contemporaneous samples from the donor and recipient obtained at the time of diagnosis of DCL in the recipient (23 years after HSCT). We identified two key findings: 1) a shared SF3B1 K666 mutation in donor and recipient, and 2) divergent clonal evolution, with ASXL1 C789X in the donor, and ASXL1 G642fs, SETBP1 D868N, and SUZ12 D605E in the recipient (Figure 2). In this context, the recipient had a morphologic diagnosis of MDS/MPN overlap, while the donor had abnormal RBC indices but no cytopenias. Since CHIP is associated with subtle abnormalities in hematologic parameters even in the absence of overt cytopenias, we evaluated potential donors with non-exclusionary CBC abnormalities, such as abnormal white blood cell differential or elevated MCV. In two cases, we prospectively identified DNMT3A mutations (R736Cand R882H, variant allele fractions 11.5% and 2%, respectively), consistent with donor CHIP. In one case, the donor with CHIP was used for transplantation. At 90 days after HSCT, donor cell chimerism was 99%; sequencing of recipient peripheral blood revealed the donor-derived DNMT3A mutation and the recipient remained persistently anemic, macrocytic, and thrombocytopenic. Conclusion We identified healthy stem cell donors with clonal hematopoiesis, marked by mutations in canonical genetic drivers of myeloid malignancies. In each instance, the aberrant clone engrafted in the transplant recipient, underwent selective expansion, and caused development of abnormal hematopoietic function. Our findings suggest that donor-derived clonal hematopoiesis may be common, especially in grafts from older donors, and that donor CHIP may confer an unrecognized and increased risk of leukemic and non-leukemic endpoints. We further demonstrate that donor CHIP can be identified prospectively, thus highlighting an emerging challenge in HSCT that may influence donor selection strategies as the clinical significance of donor CHIP is systematically elucidated. Disclosures Ritz: Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Soiffer:Juno: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Kiadis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lindsley:MedImmune: Research Funding; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».