FAS Mutations in Follicular Lymphoma Are Rare but Associated with Aggressive Clinical Behavior.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 3967 Poster Board III-903 Background Follicular lymphoma (FL) is considered an indolent but incurable lymphoma. Treatment with cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone and rituximab (CVP-R) provides complete or partial responses in most patients. The BCL2 translocation t(14;18) is present in 85% of the cases, but additional genomic alterations must occur to induce overt FL. We have sequenced the genome and transcriptome of a cytogenetically normal FL sample taken from a patient (pt 1) that had an unusually aggressive clinical course with the aim of identifying genomic alterations that could contribute to FL pathogenesis. We identified a mutation in FAS/CD95, a key component of the extrinsic apoptotic pathway. We hypothesized that FAS mutations may contribute to treatment resistance in FL by inhibiting apoptosis. This study investigates the prevalence and clinical outcome of patients with FL harbouring mutations in the exons coding for the functional “death domain” of the FAS gene. Methods The initial FL sample was subjected to cytogenetic analysis and whole genome tiling array comparative genomic hybridization followed by next-generation sequencing of the tumour genome and tumor transcriptome following the manufacturer's protocol (Illumina). FAS emerged as a potential candidate that could explain the unusually aggressive FL. We performed PCR amplification of exons 7,8,9 and the 3'UTR of the FAS gene with universal M13F(-21) and M13 primer extensions on pre-treatment FL samples derived from 214 patients including 33 diffuse large B cell lymphoma samples that had evolved from a prior FL (i.e. paired FL and DLBCL). PCR products were purified using AMPpure magnetic beads and bi-directionally sequenced using BigDye® Terminator v3.1 and an ABI 3730 XL sequencer. Analysis was performed using Mutation Surveyor. Mutations were considered present if they were observed in both forward and reverse reads. Results Patient 1 had a t(14;18) negative, grade 1 FL, that progressed rapidly despite CVP-R and second line chemotherapy but is now in complete remission following an allogeneic stem cell transplant. The FL immunophenotype was CD19+, CD10+, BCL2+, BCL6+ and lambda clonal. Minimal genomic gains and losses were observed by aCGH. After filtering known single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), a total of 320 candidate novel protein-altering changes were identified (affecting 298 genes) in the tumor genome and transcriptome sequence data. Validation of the mutated genes by Sanger sequencing revealed a novel, somatic and coding mutation in FAS at genomic position chr10:90764005, changing C to T, resulting in a premature truncation of the protein. We then sequenced exons 7, 8, 9 and the 3'UTR of the FAS gene from 214 FL patients. Ten novel FAS mutations were detected, of these six were coding, three of which produced a truncated protein. Of the six coding mutations, two were observed in the transformed DLBCL sample. Coding mutations in FAS appeared to be associated with an aggressive clinical course (median time to progression=12 months for coding mutations (n=6) vs 34 months for non-coding or wild type (n=208), P=0.06). 2 of the 6 patients developed early transformation to DLBCL, 2 had treatment resistant FL that required allogeneic bone marrow transplant and 2 have already died due to progressive treatment refractory FL. Conclusion Next generation sequencing technology revealed novel somatic mutations in a cytogenetically normal FL sample, one of which was a mutation in the FAS gene. Sanger sequencing of a large cohort of FL samples revealed that 5% of cases harboured novel mutations in the death domain of FAS (2% coding, 3% non-coding). Coding mutations were rare but when present were associated with atypically aggressive disease. Disclosures: Connors: Roche Canada: Research Funding. Gascoyne:Roche Canada: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».