Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) in Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH): A Multicenter Retrospective Descriptional Study
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is an inflammatory myeloid neoplasia characterized by the accumulation of CD1a+ CD207+ histiocytes. Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH), a non-malignant histiocytic disorder, is typified by the accumulation and activation of CD8+ T cells and macrophages, which secrete high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines. The co-existence of LCH and HLH has been reported, albeit rarely, and is believed to be associated with a poorer outcome. To better understand the relationship between these two conditions, in this study we sought to describe the incidence, risk factors for development, and outcome of HLH when it develops in children and young adults with multisystem-LCH (MS-LCH). Methods: We conducted a retrospective study involving 14 centers and collected data on 384 MS-LCH patients aged less than 30 years and who were diagnosed between year 2000 and 2015. Data collected on the eligible patients included clinical information at the time of LCH diagnosis, clinical and laboratory parameters at HLH diagnosis (for those who developed HLH), treatment and disease outcome. Patients who developed HLH were classified as having "true-HLH", which was defined as disease fulfilling 5 of 8 HLH-2004 diagnostic criteria or as "HLH-like" disorder, which was defined as fulfilling <5 of 8 HLH diagnostic criteria but whose disease status was suggestive of HLH and treated with HLH- and/or LCH-directed therapy. Results: Of 384 MS-LCH patients, 44 (11%) were identified with HLH (29 with true HLH and 15 with an HLH-like disorder), ranging in age from 15 days to 20.6 years (median, 1.12 years). The majority of MS-LCH patients who also had HLH were females (n=27) and had accompanying risk organ (liver, spleen and/or hematopoietic system) involvement (RO+) (n=40), as opposed to non-HLH MS-LCH patients. Among nine HLH patients tested for BRAF V600E mutation status, eight were found to be positive. Twenty (45%) patients developed HLH (true or HLH-like) concurrent (±7 days) with LCH diagnosis, while 24 (55%) developed HLH >7 days before or after LCH diagnosis. The 3-year cumulative incidence of HLH (true or HLH-like) in MS-LCH was 16.8%. The 5-year overall survival of LCH patients without HLH was 98 ± 9%, while survival for those with an HLH-like disorder or true-HLH was 75 ± 12% and 70 ± 14%, respectively (P<0.0001). Age <2 years, female gender, RO+ and lack of bone involvement at LCH diagnosis were each independently associated with increased risk for HLH. Among 20 HLH patients with available data, the median soluble interleukin-2 receptor level (sIL-2R) was 16,220 U/mL (range, 1,149 to 60,420 U/mL) (normal reference <2,400 U/mL), ferritin was 505 ng/mL (range, 28 to 26,660 ng/mL) (normal reference <500 ng/mL), and sIL-2R/ferritin ratio was 42. Conclusion: The development of HLH in patients with MS-LCH was not uncommon and associated with a poorer prognosis. Young females with RO+ MS-LCH who lack bone lesions at LCH diagnosis were at increased risk of developing HLH. Ferritin levels appear to be lower in comparison to patients who develop HLH in other contexts. There are overlapping features between MS-LCH and HLH that make the clinical distinction between these disorders difficult. Accordingly, improved biomarkers are needed to facilitate the identification of HLH in patients with MS-LCH. It is anticipated that early identification of HLH and prompt intervention may improve the outcome for affected individuals. Future prospective studies are needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms and identify more effective therapies. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».