Science Culture in the Nineteenth Century: Women and the Botanical Society of Canada

Looking at the surviving records of the Botanical Society of Canada (1860-1863), this article considers the presence and activity of women in in the nineteenth century, The evidence of their independent scientific studies during this period in which science was in transition towards the model we currently recognize indicates that there is a need to reconsider the limited roles and places of women, and other marginalized participants in the history of science. ********** In 1829 John Lindley held his inaugural lecture as the first professor of botany at London University. The underpinning ideology of this lecture was the necessity to save the important of botany from languishing as mere polite accomplishment and amusement for ladies and to reinforce its importance as an occupation for of enlightened minds. (1) Ann Shteir has noted that Lindley's deliberate separation of polite botany as a pastime for women and botanical as a pursuit for men signaled the direction botanical culture took during the succeeding decades. (2) This is also the period in which a shift that initiated a split between amateur and professional practitioners began and the formerly fluid identities of naturalist and scientist began to harden into distinctive, defined categories into which it was increasingly difficult to gain entry. Although botany had been considered as particularly suited to women, in part due to women's apparent pleasure in flowers, space for women within botanical culture shrank as opportunities within botany began to grow. However, this does not mean that those who appeared to be excluded from the new categories of professional, expert, legitimate, and scientist simply accepted being defined out of participation, or accepted their relegation to the fringes and outskirts of the growing scientific community. If we concur with Deglar's argument that proscriptive writing and positioning occurs as an attempt to establish new ideologies and behaviours, and are only necessary when the intended audience does not behave in the proscribed manner, (3) than the continued arguments to limit amateur participation (and women were considered de facto amateurs) raises the possibility that women and other amateurs likely continued to be more active and central than their professional counterparts considered desirable. Botany came to be particularly associated with women for much of the nineteenth century particularly because botanical activities fitted neatly with gendered assumptions about feminine characteristics and role in society; the aesthetics of flowers were considered to parallel feminine beauty and botanical studies were considered an antidote to women's frivolous nature and to superficial accomplishments. In addition, botanical studies offered both the possibility of increased health through outdoor exercise that could be con ducted within one's own garden, if necessary, at a gentle non-taxing pace, (4) and a path to piety through natural theology. (5) Moreover, there was no cruelty involved as there was with other scientific pursuits that involved animals or insects that were killed, dissected, or mounted for collections, and it encouraged observation, (6) rational thought, a systematic approach and perseverance to learn about plants and to create a collection or herbaria, the hallmark of serious study. (7) This feminine identification became so strong that towards the end of the century one writer was inspired to ask in Science magazine, Is Botany a Suitable Study for Young Men? (8) The sense of female identification may have spurred men like Lindley to publicly differentiate their activities in order to bolster and solidify their sense of masculinity and the social value and worth of their botanical work. (9) Examining the surviving records of the Botanical Society of Canada (1860-1863) presents an opportunity to consider the case of Mrs. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.