MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2588440521 · doi:10.1093/pch/6.4.184

Pertussis immunization for adolescents: What are we waiting for?

2001· article· en· W2588440521 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Scott A. Halperin

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueBacterial Infections and Vaccines
Établissements canadiensGrace (Canada)Dalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineDiphtheriaTetanusImmunizationPertussis vaccinePediatricsWhooping coughPopulationInactivated Poliovirus VaccineVaccinationHib vaccineImmunologyConjugate vaccineEnvironmental healthAntibody

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Immunization against pertussis (whooping cough) has been part of the routine childhood immunization program for over 50 years. Until 1997, a whole cell pertussis vaccine was used, most often combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids; in some jurisdictions it was combined with inactivated poliovirus vaccine and later with Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)-conjugate vaccine. Vaccine doses were given at two, four, six and 18 months of age, and again at four to six years of age. Use of the whole cell vaccine in children seven years of age and older was not recommended because “the incidence and severity of the disease greatly decrease with age, and because adverse reactions are (may be) more common in older children and adults...” (1–3). Over a one-year period in 1997/98, all provinces in Canada began using an acellular pertussis vaccine, again combined with diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, inactivated poliovirus vaccine and Hibconjugate vaccine. In 1999, an acellular pertussis vaccine that was combined with tetanus and diphtheria toxoids (TdaP) (Adacel, Aventis Pasteur, Canada) was licensed for use in individuals 12 to 54 years of age in Canada. In Germany, a similar adolescent and adult TdaP was licensed in 2000 (Boostrix, SmithKline Beecham, Belgium). With the availability of a TdaP product in Canada, should routine universal immunization against pertussis be provided for all adolescents and adults? Some of the key issues to be considered when answering this question are addressed in the questions and answers that follow. The focus of the present paper is on the adolescent population; however, similar issues about adult immunization need to be addressed by internal medicine and family practice practitioners. Pertussis continues to be primarily a disease of childhood; most cases are reported in children younger than five years of age, with the highest incidence (and the highest morbidity and mortality rates) in infants younger than one year of age. Over the past 10 years, there has been a resurgence of pertussis from an average of 1000 to 2000 cases reported to the notifiable disease surveillance system annually to 7000 to 10,000 cases reported annually (4). The most rapid increase in cases of pertussis has occurred in adolescents. In 1986, 5.2% of patients with pertussis in Canada were adolescents aged 10 to 19 years (1.4% of patients were adults who were at least 20 years of age). In 1992, adolescents accounted for 11.2% of reported cases (adults 6.2%), and by 1997, adolescents accounted for 20% of reported cases (adults 11.7%) (4,5). In addition, large community outbreaks of pertussis in adolescents have been reported in New Brunswick, British Columbia and the United States (6,7). These passive surveillance systems most likely under-report the incidence of pertussis in the population. Pertussis, as an adolescent and adult illness, is not unique in Canada. In the United States, pertussis in adolescents is also increasingly being recognized and reported (8). Both seroepidemiological studies (9–11), and studies of cough illness in adolescents and adults (12–17) suggest that pertussis is a frequent cause of prolonged cough. Difficulties in culture confirmation of pertussis in adolescents and adults (18) hinder precise determinations of the true proportion of cough illness due to Bordetella pertussis; reliance on serological diagnosis remains fraught with nonstandardized assays and varying serological definitions of positivity. Estimates of the role of pertussis in prolonged cough illness in adolescents and adults range from 1% to 25% (12–18). Pertussis in adolescents can range from a nonspecific, prolonged cough illness to classical pertussis that includes a paroxysmal cough, post-tussive vomiting and whoop. The mean duration of the cough has been reported to be from 43 to 49 days; however, these data may be skewed by a reporting bias that results from the under-diagnosis of milder cases (17,19). Until more complete identification of pertussis in adolescents and adults is possible, it will not be possible to describe the spectrum of disease presentation and frequency. Although the complications of the disease that are common in infants, such as apnea and pneumonia, are unusual in adolescents and adults, adolescents and adults may suffer rib fracture, conjunctival hemorrhage, rectal prolapse or urinary incontinence (19,20). Although the manner in which pertussis spreads in the community is not completely understood, it is clear that adolescents (and adults) appear to be infected by younger school-aged and preschool-aged children, and adolescents (and adults) are the source of infection of young infants (21–24). In one outbreak, having an adolescent mother was an important risk factor for pertussis in infants younger than one year of age (25). This observation is particularly worrying because of the increased morbidity and mortality from pertussis in the younger age group. Currently, one acellular pertussis vaccine (Adacel) is licensed for use in adolescents in Canada. In prelicensure studies in over 2000 adolescents and adults, the TdaP vaccine was well tolerated; the most frequent adverse reactions were redness (in 11% to 22% of patients) and tenderness at the injection site (in 88% of patients) (26,27). Systemic reactions were much less common; fever was reported by 1% to 5% of vaccine recipients. There were no differences in the rates of reactions between recipients of the TdaP vaccine and those who were given the standard (adult type) tetanus-diptheria toxoid (Td) vaccine; this suggests that the addition of the acellular pertussis vaccine component did not significantly increase the adverse events associated with the immunization. Acellular pertussis vaccines induce a vigorous antibody response in adolescents to all of the antigens contained in the vaccine (26–28). Although serological correlates of immunity are not well established, the antibody levels achieved after vaccination with Adacel are well in excess of those measured in studies that established the efficacy of the vaccine in infants who received the three-dose primary series (29). An efficacy study using Boostrix in adolescents and adults in the United States has been completed and will soon be reported, but it is not yet clear whether the study will have sufficient power to assess efficacy adequately. The Canadian National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) statement on TdaP (30) concludes that a single dose of TdaP in adolescents and adults “...increases their pertussis antibody levels far in excess of those observed in Sweden in infants who receive three doses of acellular pertussis vaccine...” and that “as the efficacy demonstrated in the Swedish trial was 85% (95% confidence interval: 81% to 89%), it is reasonable to expect that the protection against severe disease in adolescents and adults would be of the same order, and this may lead to reduced transmission.” However, NACI concludes and recommends that TdaP “...can be used to replace the adolescent booster dose of Td for those individuals who wish to have protection. There are no data available at the moment on which to base a recommendation for universal routine use”. The shortest answer to this questions is both yes and no. NACI's summary of the data is accurate; one can only infer from the available data that a single dose of TdaP is effective in preventing pertussis. Neither the duration of protection nor the need for subsequent doses is known; however, data from an early study with a single booster dose with another acellular pertussis vaccine indicate that antibody levels remain above prebooster levels for at least eight years (31). Data available for the adolescent dose are similar to that available for the 18-month reinforcing dose and the preschool booster; these doses were implemented to replace the doses given with the whole cell vaccine, without data on their efficacy or the duration of immunity after the primary series. It is clear that adolescents are susceptible to pertussis due to waning immunity following their preschool dose (32). Perhaps as a result of NACI's overly negative assessment of the strength of evidence for universal adolescent immunization, only one province (Newfoundland) has implemented a routine adolescent immunization program. Many steps can be taken to control further pertussis in adolescents and adults (and perhaps in infants, as an additional benefit). Manufacturers should provide additional data that are necessary to convince advisory committees and program planners about the benefits of universal adolescent pertussis immunization. This information should include efficacy data (perhaps using pertussis outbreaks as a scenario for a vaccine clinical trial) or effectiveness data gathered via enhanced surveillance before and after the implementation of universal immunization programs in selected jurisdictions. Licensure of an adult formulation acellular pertussis vaccine alone (not combined with Td) will facilitate the provision of vaccine to adolescents who were recently immunized with Td. Practising physicians should be more aware of the possible occurrence of pertussis in older children and adults, and attempt to confirm the diagnosis. Enhanced reporting of suspected and confirmed cases of pertussis would better define the true burden of illness. Public health officials should also make surveillance of pertussis in adolescents and adults a higher priority to identify outbreaks at an earlier stage (which may facilitate a clinical efficacy trial), and to provide the necessary information on which program planners can make decisions about the implementation of universal immunization programs. Despite the NACI recommendations, program planners in each province should review the clinical, epidemiological and clinical trial data so that decisions can be made using the same criteria used to implement other vaccine and health interventions. In the interim, paediatricians and family physicians should make acellular pertussis vaccine available to their patients, particularly in areas where outbreaks of pertussis occur. As with all vaccines, adolescents and parents should be given the information that is available on the risks and benefits of this immunization as a part of the normal informed consent process.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,028
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,094

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,025
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,002
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,003
Communication savante0,0060,018
Science ouverte0,0030,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0150,022
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0280,010

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,278
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations11
Publié2001
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetBacterial Infections and VaccinesTravaux en français237 207