A Cohort Study of Warfarin Administered to Achieve An INR of 2.0 to 3.0 for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thrombosis in Patients with An Antiphospholipid Antibody.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 3123 Poster Board III-60 Introduction Despite recent evidence, controversy remains regarding the optimal method of recurrent thrombosis prevention in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies (APLA) and prior thrombosis. Specifically, although two randomized trials have supported the efficacy of “usual intensity warfarin” (administered to a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0) there remains a dearth of prospective data examining this treatment. The aim of our study was to confirm that patients with prior thrombosis and an APLA had a low risk of recurrent thrombosis while being treated with warfarin administered to achieve an INR of 2.0 to 3.0. Methods We examined the annual rate of recurrent thrombosis in patients with prior thrombosis and APLA who had all been treated with OAT (oral anticoagulant therapy) to achieve a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0. Eligible patients had to have had at least one prior objectively confirmed arterial or venous thrombosis and at least one positive standardized test for an APLA. Patients were selected from the Victoria Hospital, and follow up appointments were conducted through the hospital's thrombosis clinic. Consenting patients underwent a baseline clinical examination with the intent to be followed every six months for evidence of recurrent thrombosis, adverse consequences of anticoagulation therapy, or until death. Results Eighty three patients (mean age 50.5 years; 50 females) were enrolled; one patient was lost to follow up and did not contribute data to the analyses. Median follow up was 12 months (Range 5-18 months). No patients experienced a recurrent thrombotic event. 10 patients (12.2%) had a minor bleeding event (5 had significant ecchymosis, two had rectal bleeding, two had vaginal bleeding, and one had hematuria). No major bleeding events occurred. One patient had a presumed transient ischemic attack (TIA). One patient (1.2%) died during follow up due to multi-system organ failure in the context of a failing hepatic allograft. Conclusion Patients with previous thrombosis and an APLA have a low risk of recurrent thrombosis while having a target INR of 2.0 to 3.0. “Usual intensity warfarin” therapy appears to be an adequate method of thromboprophylaxis in these patients. Disclosures Crowther: BI: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Artisan Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».