MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2588684164 · doi:10.1182/blood.v114.22.2681.2681

Bendamustine Produces Durable Responses with An Acceptable Long-Term Safety Profile in Patients with Rituximab-Refractory Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: A Pooled Analysis.

2009· article· en· W2588684164 sur OpenAlexaff
Bruce D. Cheson, Jonathan W. Friedberg, Brad S. Kahl, Richard H. van der Jagt, Lothar Tremmel, Tal Zaks

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensOttawa Hospital
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBendamustineMedicineRituximabInternal medicineRefractory (planetary science)RegimenSalvage therapyPopulationFollicular lymphomaChemotherapy regimenOncologyGastroenterologySurgeryChemotherapyLymphoma

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 2681 Poster Board II-657 Background: Although initially very responsive to therapy, indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHLs) are generally incurable. Therefore, it is important to identify active and tolerable treatments for patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory disease. Bendamustine (B, Treanda®), a mechlorethamine alkylator with novel mechanisms of action, is approved in the US for the treatment of indolent B-cell NHL that has progressed during or after rituximab (R) or an R-containing regimen. Methods: Data from 2 North American, multicenter studies with similar design and enrollment and response assessment criteria were pooled to examine safety and durability of response and allow meaningful comparisons between groups receiving prior therapies. B 120 mg/m2 was given IV on D 1, 2 q 21 days × 6-8 cycles to pts with R-refractory indolent NHL. Pts with transformed disease were excluded from efficacy analyses. Endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: The primary analysis set consisted of all randomized pts (N=176; median 61 yr; 81% stage III/IV; median 2 prior chemotherapy- and 2 R-containing courses) and comprises the population for safety analyses. Histologies included follicular (68%), small lymphocytic (20%), marginal zone (11%), and lymphoplasmacytic (1%) lymphomas. Fifty-four (35%) pts were refractory to their last chemotherapy; 49 (28%) were refractory to their last alkylator-based regimen. Sixty-six (38%) pts received prior purine analogs (PA); 22 (33%) of these pts were PA refractory. Ninety-four (53%) pts received ≥6 cycles of B; early withdrawals were primarily due to adverse events (AEs, 28%, mostly myelosuppression [18%]) or disease progression (14%). Dose reduction occurred in 14% of cycles; 18% of cycles involved a treatment delay. Common nonhematologic AEs, primarily grade 1/2, were nausea (75%), fatigue (57%), vomiting (40%), and diarrhea (37%). 97% of pts received antiemetic therapy during study treatment. Grade 3/4 hematologic AEs included neutropenia (58%), thrombocytopenia (25%), and anemia (11%). Overall, 50 opportunistic infections in 48 pts were reported: herpes zoster (HZ, 18), herpes simplex (7), candidiasis (16), cytomegaloviral infection (5), Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (2), atypical mycobacterial infection (1), and tuberculosis (1). HZ reactivation tended to be higher in pts with prior PA exposure (13% vs 8 %, P=NS); pts receiving prophylactic antivirals (n=18) did not experience HZ outbreaks, while an 11% incidence of outbreaks was observed in those not prophylaxed. Second malignancies occurred in 6 pts: 3 MDS, 1 CMML, 1 squamous cell carcinoma, and 1 AML. Two pts had tumor lysis syndrome (1 each grades 3 and 4) in the first cycle. Grade 3/4 AE frequencies were similar by prior PA exposure, except for neutropenia (41% vs 29%) and infection rate (26% vs 14%), which were higher in PA-pretreated pts. Grade 3/4 AEs were higher in pts '60 yr vs <60 yr (78% vs 63%), mainly due to fatigue (15% vs 6%), thrombocytopenia (23% vs 6%), and cardiac disorders (8% vs 2%). In 161 pts evaluable for efficacy (i.e., without transformed disease), B produced a 76% ORR (23% complete response [CR]/unconfirmed complete response [CRu]); in 75% of responders, the best response was recorded during cycles 1 to 3. Median (range) follow-up was 17 (11.5–24) months and DOR was 9 (7.1–10.5) months. At 1 and 2 years, 34% and 24% of responders continued to respond. Stratified by FLIPI, ORR was 77%, 75%, and 79% for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively; corresponding median DOR was 7.8, 9.0, and 7.0 months. Among 127 pts previously treated with alkylators, ORR was 88% (28% CR/CRu) in sensitive and 59% (12% CR/CRu) in refractory populations; corresponding median DOR was 9.3 and 7.7 months. Overall PFS was 9.0 (95% CI: 8–10.9) months; median PFS for alkylator-sensitive and -refractory pts was 10.9 (8.4–12.5) and 7.1 (4.0–9.3) months, respectively. Among 66 pts previously treated with PA, ORR was 81% and 64% for sensitive and refractory PA groups, respectively. ORR and DOR were similar by age (< or >65 yr), gender, histology, prior chemotherapy (' or >1). Conclusions: Durable responses and acceptable safety support the use of bendamustine in R-refractory pts with indolent NHL, even those who were refractory to prior alkylator- and PA-based treatments. PFS will be updated and pooled, and presented at the ASH meeting. Disclosures: Cheson: Cephalon, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Friedberg:Cephalon, Inc.: Research Funding. Kahl:Cephalon, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. van der Jagt:Cephalon, Inc.: Research Funding. Tremmel:Cephalon, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Zaks:Cephalon, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,013
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Méta-analyse · Signal consensuel: Méta-analyse
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,013
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,067

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0130,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,008
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,242
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeMéta-analyse
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→Travaux en français237 207→