MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2588744190 · doi:10.1182/blood.v116.21.1401.1401

Immune Response Following Exposures to Topical Bovine Thrombin Does Not Impair Hemostasis

2010· article· en· W2588744190 sur OpenAlexaff
Craig Paterson, Glenn C. Pixton, Howard M. Proskin, Joseph M. Massaro, Mark Morasch, Jawed Fareed, Frederick A. Ofosu, Bruce N. Cronstein

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemostasis and retained surgical items
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineHemostasisThrombinClinical endpointRandomized controlled trialThrombin generationSurgeryAnesthesiaInternal medicinePlatelet

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1401 Introduction: Topical bovine thrombin has been used for over 30 years as an adjunct to accelerate intraoperative hemostasis for minor oozing or bleeding. Antibody-mediated hemostatic abnormalities suggested in case reports and small uncontrolled case series have raised safety concerns about topical bovine thrombin preparations. However, in 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the only currently available topical bovine thrombin (Thrombin-JMI®) with topical recombinant (Chapman WC et al, J Am Coll Surg 2007;205:256-265) or plasma-derived (Doria C et al, CMRO 2008;24:785-794) human thrombins, similar efficacy and safety profiles were established for all 3 preparations. Study Goals: To characterize the primary and secondary immune responses following intraoperative exposure and potential re-exposure to topical bovine thrombin and explore any potential relationship to hemostatic abnormalities. Study Design: This prospective, observational cohort study enrolled 554 patients from 50 US sites who were scheduled to undergo surgery and had a previous surgical procedure ≤4 years earlier with probable intraoperative exposure to topical bovine thrombin. Cohorts were defined prospectively but assigned at the conclusion of the study period, based on the presence or absence of human anti-bovine thrombin antibodies (aBT) in preoperative (baseline) plasma samples and intraoperative exposure or non-exposure to THROMBIN-JMI®. The primary study cohort included patients with aBT pre-surgery who received THROMBIN-JMI® during the study surgery, whereas the primary reference cohort was comprised of patients with no aBT pre-surgery who did not receive THROMBIN-JMI® during study surgery. The primary end point was the mean change from baseline in aPTT at 48 h post-surgery. Secondary analyses included explorations of the relationships between changes in aBT, human anti-bovine factor V/Va antibodies (aBV/Va), human anti-human thrombin antibodies (aHT), human anti-human factor V/Va antibodies (aHV/Va) and coagulation parameters at 48 h and 4 and 8 weeks after surgery as well as incidences of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results: The adjusted mean change in aPTT values at 48 h post-surgery for the primary study cohort exceeded that for the primary reference cohort by 2.03 sec (1-sided 97.5% upper confidence bound [UCB] of 4.67 sec). The UCB exceeded the prespecified 4.5 sec non-inferiority margin (chosen as 15% of expected mean baseline aPTT of 30 sec). Hence, non-inferiority was not met. Of note, the observed baseline aPTT in this study population was higher than expected (32.38 sec) and non-inferiority would have been met had the non-inferiority margin been a relative margin a priori set at 15% of baseline aPTT. There were no significant differences in the mean aPTT change observed in all other cohort comparisons at 48 h post-surgery. Similarly, there was no significant prolongation of the aPTT at 4 and 8 weeks post-surgery in any of the cohort comparisons. Moreover, exposure to THROMBIN-JMI® did not lead to any change in immunologic (aHT, aBT, aHV/Va, or aBV/Va) markers at 48 h post-surgery. Immunologic markers evident at 4 or 8 weeks post-surgery demonstrated no relationship to any changes in coagulation measures. There was no evidence of any effect of prior exposure to thrombin, current THROMBIN-JMI® treatment, or presence of pre-surgery aBT on the incidence of TEAEs. Overall, these data indicate that in patients treated with THROMBIN-JMI® the presence of pre-surgery aBT or aBV/Va does not lead to impaired hemostasis. Conclusion: Primary or secondary immune responses to perioperative exposure/re-exposure to THROMBIN-JMI® do not adversely affect hemostasis after surgery. These results confirm earlier conclusions from 2 RCTs comparing topical bovine thrombin and recombinant and plasma-derived human thrombins. Disclosures: Paterson: King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Pixton:King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Proskin:King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Massaro:King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Morasch: W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Fareed:King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Sanofi-Aventis: Consultancy; Polymedix: Consultancy; Mitsubishi Pharma: Research Funding. Ofosu:King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Cronstein:King Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cephalon: Consultancy; Cypress Bioscience, Inc: Consultancy; CanFite Biopharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Cellzome: Consultancy; Takeda Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Prometheus Laboratories: Consultancy; Regeneron (Westat, DSMB): Consultancy; Sepracor: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Endocyte: Consultancy; Protalex: Consultancy; Allos, Inc.: Consultancy; Combinatorx: Consultancy; Kyowa Hakka: Consultancy; Hoffman-LaRoche: Consultancy; Savient: Consultancy; Avidimer Therapeutics: Consultancy; NIH: Research Funding; Vilcek Foundation: Research Funding; OSI Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Vilcek Foundation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bagels, ice cream, snacks, etc: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli Lilly & Co.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; UCB: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; adenosine A2A receptor agonists to promote wound healing and use of A2A receptor antagonists to inhibit fibrosis.: Patents & Royalties; adenosine A1 receptor antagonists to treat osteoporosis and other diseases of bone.: Patents & Royalties; adenosine A1 and A2B Receptor antagonists to treat fatty liver: Patents & Royalties; adenosine A2A receptor agonists to prevent prosthesis loosening: Patents & Royalties; CanFite Biopharmaceuticals received for membership in Scientific Advisory Board.: Equity Ownership, Speakers Bureau.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,175
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,566

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,285
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHemostasis and retained surgical itemsTravaux en français237 207