Peer influence on healthy eating and physical activity of preschoolers: A systematic review
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Approximately 12% of children under the age of five living in developed countries are overweight or obese. It is suggested that preschoolers begin to modify their health-related behaviours during the preschool years as they become exposed to new environments, such as childcare centres. Since children learn by observing and imitating the behaviours of those whom they perceive as similar to themselves, peers may play an important role in promoting healthy eating behaviours and physical activity in young children. This paper systematically reviews how peers influence preschoolers’ behaviours, and how future interventions can include children in the promotion of healthier eating and increase physical activity levels in childcare centres. Methods Six international databases were searched for quantitative, peer-reviewed, English or French primary studies reporting on the correlates, predictors or effectiveness of peers as role models for healthy eating and physical activity in preschoolers. Risk of bias was independently assessed by two evaluators using the Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Results Thirteen articles were included in this review: six measured physical activity, and seven assessed dietary intake. The quality score was rated as weak for nine of these articles, and as moderate for the remaining four. Four of the six physical activity studies reported that children were more physically active when one or more peers were present, compared to being alone, while large peer group size was negatively associated with physical activity in two cross-sectional studies. All nutrition intervention studies reported that children’s eating behaviors may be influenced by their peers’ food choices, preferences and modeling. Conclusions There is low evidence that peers may act as role models to children’s eating and physical activity behaviours, and that the influence of peers may be mediated by the number of peers, sex, age and the perceived status of the peers. Future interventions should target peers as agents for positive eating and physical activity behaviour changes in childcare centres. Key messages Peers could act as role models for promoting healthy eating and physical activity in preschoolers Higher quality experimental studies are needed to confirm these observations
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,018 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,006 | 0,007 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».