MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2588790279 · doi:10.1093/pch/8.1.11

Access to vaccines: A call to action

2003· article· en· W2588790279 sur OpenAlexaff
Noni E. MacDonald, Joanne Embreé

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Établissements canadiensUniversity of ManitobaDalhousie University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCall to actionAction (physics)Internet privacyVirologyMedicineBusinessComputer scienceAdvertising

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The World Health Organization, UNICEF and the World Bank released a report entitled “State of the World's Vaccines and Immunization” in November 2002 (1). Nelson Mandela, Chair of the Vaccine Fund Board, in a foreword to the report entitled “Call to Action” eloquently pleaded for a commitment for the equitable access to immunization for all of the world's children (2). He stated that immunization “is the most powerful of all preventive health measures for children and is central to human rights and poverty alleviation. It is the right of every child to be given this kind of protection.” Most countries find it very surprising that, in Canada, we have inequity of access to vaccines to protect our country's population. Canada is one of the few highly developed countries in the world without a national immunization strategy. Because of the provincial and territorial ‘patchwork quilt’ system of immunization provision, Canadian children and youth do not have an equal opportunity to be protected by all of the vaccines recommended by the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI). Children residing in different provinces have different access to publicly funded vaccines (Table 1). For example, while children in Alberta receive varicella vaccine, conjugate meningococcal C vaccine and conjugate pneumococcal vaccine through publicly funded programs, no other province or territory provides all three of these newer vaccines. Also, only youth in Newfoundland and Labrador and the Northwest Territories have the opportunity to protect themselves from pertussis by receiving the acellular pertussis vaccine along with their adolescent tetanus and diphtheria toxoid booster in a funded program. While all of the vaccines are recommended by NACI, children in Canada who reside in provinces or territories where the newly licensed vaccines are not provided through a publicly funded system have access to them only if their parents have the funds available to pay for them (3). Why do these inequities exist? We do not have a strategy in place whereby new vaccines can be uniformly and quickly assimilated into the universal provincial and territorial programs across Canada. We do not have a national immunization strategy. Children's access to publicly funded vaccines in Canada Children's access to publicly funded vaccines in Canada The proposed National Immunization Strategy (4), which has been endorsed by the Canadian Paediatric Society and the Canadian Infectious Disease Society, seeks as its primary goal the equitable access to NACI recommended vaccines for all Canadian children and adults. In his report (5), Romanow recommends implementation of the National Immunization Strategy (Recommendation 24). The establishment of the National Immunization Strategy will not happen, however, without support from the governments of all the provinces and territories as well as that of the federal government. We, as health care providers, need to advocate now to ensure that the proposed National Immunization Strategy moves from being a vision to becoming a reality. To do this, we need to make certain that the politicians, who will decide the ultimate fate of the National Immunization Strategy, know how important it is to health. How can we do this? Each of us needs to educate all of our elected representatives (The Member of Parliament for your federal riding, the Member of the Legislative Assembly for your provincial or territorial riding, the Minister of Health for Canada, the Minister of Health for your province or territory, the Prime Minister of Canada and your Provincial or Territorial Premier) in person or by letter about the National Immunization Strategy and the importance of providing adequate funding for its successful implementation. The establishment of the National Immunization Strategy will significantly improve our ability to provide equitable access to optimal health care to all of the children, youth and adults of Canada.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,039
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,049
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,091
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,204

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0390,049
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,003
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,019
Communication savante0,0120,028
Science ouverte0,0060,020
Intégrité de la recherche0,0910,072
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0370,009

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,364
Écart entre enseignants0,324 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child Health→Même sujetVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy→Travaux en français237 207→