Optimal Power Allocation for a Successive Refinable Source with Multiple Descriptions over a Fading Relay Channel Using Broadcast/Multicast Strategies
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In a wireless fading relay system with multicast/broadcast transmission, one of the most crucial challenges is the optimization of a transmission rate under multiuser channel diversity. Previously reported solutions for mitigating the vicious effect due to multi-user channel diversity have been mainly based on superposition coded multicast, where an optimal power allocation to each layer of modulated signals is determined. Many previous studies investigated a harmonic interplay between the successively re nable (SR) content source and a layered modulation via superposition coding (SPC) over the multicast/broadcast channels. By jointly considering the successive re nement characteristic at the source and the dependency of the layered modulation at the channel, a graceful fexibility can be achieved on a group of users with di erent channel realizations. Here most of the receivers are supposed to obtain the base quality layer information modulated in a lower rate, while the receivers with better channel realizations will obtain more information by re ning the base quality layer information using the enhancement quality layer information. In particular, the optimal power allocation for a SR source over a fading relay channel using broadcast/multicast strategy can be determined such that the minimum distortion of total received information is produced. \n \nHowever, a quality layer of data in a successively refined source may not be decodable if there is any loss of channel codewords, even if the corresponding longterm channel realization is su cient for decoding. To overcome this problem, one of the previous studies introduced a framework of coded video multicast, where multiple description coding (MDC) is applied to an SR content source and is further mapped into a layered modulation via SPC at the channel. Up till now, there has not been a rigorous proof provided on the bene t of manipulating the two coding techniques, (i.e. MDC and SPC), nor has any systematic optimization approach been developed for quantifying the parameter selection. \n \nCooperative relaying in wireless networks has recently received much attention. Because the received signal can be severely degraded due to fading in wireless communications, time, frequency and spatial diversity techniques are introduced to overcome fading. Spatial diversity is typically envisioned as having multiple transmit and/or receive antennas. Cooperation can be used here to provide higher rates and results in a more robust system. Recently proposed cooperation schemes, which take into account the practical constraint that the relay cannot transmit and receive at the same time, include amplify-forward(AF), decode-forward(DF), and compress-forward(CF). \n \nIn this study, in a fading relay scenario, a proposed framework is investigated to tackle the task of layered power allocation, where an in-depth study is conducted on achieving an optimal power allocation in SPC, such that the information distortion perceived at the users can be minimized. This thesis provides a comprehensive \nformulation on the information distortion at the receivers and a suite of solution approaches for the developed optimization problem by jointly considering MDC and SPC parameter selection over the fading relay channel.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».