Analysis of metabolic response (MR) by positron emission tomography (PET) compared with tumor response by computed tomography (CT) from MPACT, a phase III trial comparing <i>nab</i>-paclitaxel (<i>nab</i>-P) plus gemcitabine (G) versus G alone for patients (pts) with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
254^ Background: In the MPACT trial, nab-P + G demonstrated superior efficacy vs G alone for the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). Pts with an MR (according to EORTC criteria) had a 5-month improvement in median overall survival (OS) vs those without an MR (13 vs 8 months for nab-P + G and 12 vs 7 months for G alone). This analysis examines the relationship between MR by PET and tumor response by CT. Methods: Previously untreated pts (N = 861) with metastatic PC were randomized 1:1 to receive nab-P 125 mg/m 2 + G 1000 mg/m 2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 wk or G alone 1000 mg/m 2 weekly for 7 wk followed by 1 wk of rest (cycle 1) and then days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 wk (cycle ≥ 2). Tumor responses were evaluated every 8 wk by CT using RECIST v1.0. CT-documented disease progression led to treatment discontinuation. PET scans were evaluated at baseline, wk 8, and wk 16. Results: In 257 pts with a PET scan at baseline, 252 (98%) had ≥ 2 PET-avid lesions. The rate of MR (complete [CMR] or partial [PMR]) was higher for nab-P + G vs G alone (63% vs 38%; P < 0.0001). The ORRs by CT (complete response + partial response [CR/PR]) in the same pts were 31% for nab-P + G vs 11% for G. In a pooled-treatment-arm analysis (n = 255), 130 pts (51%) had an MR by PET, and 54 (21%) had a CR or PR by CT. Among pts with an MR by PET, 32% had a CR or PR, 43% had stable disease, and 16% had progressive disease (PD) by CT. Pts who had an MR by PET in the absence of a CR or PR by CT (n = 88) had a median OS of 10 months (table). Conclusions: Rates of MR by PET in this trial were > 2-fold the response rates by CT, suggesting that PET may be a more sensitive marker of tumor response. Of the pts without a CR or PR by CT, those with an MR by PET had a longer median OS vs those without one. A set of pts who had PD by CT exhibited an MR by PET. Thus, PET may identify a set of pts who may benefit from continued treatment despite PD by CT. Further research is needed to explore the radiological and clinical characteristics of these pts. Clinical trial information: NCT00844649. [Table: see text]
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».