Feasibility of Outpatient Consolidation Chemotherapy and Toxicity in Elderly Patients with AML.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 1036 Poster Board I-58 Introduction: Consolidation chemotherapy is frequently administered on an outpatient basis in younger AML patients. However, the safety of this maneuver in older patients is unclear owing to increased co-morbidities and declines in performance status (PS) in these patients. Methods: 215 newly diagnosed AML patients aged >60 years were referred to Princess Margaret Hospital between 2002 and 2005. Of these, 108 received non-protocol treatments (32 non-intensive experimental therapy, 12 intensive chemotherapy on a study protocol, and 64 palliative therapy). The remaining 107 (50%) received standard induction chemotherapy with curative intent, consisting of cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day CIVI x 7 days and dauorubicin 60 mg/m2 IV daily x 3 (3+7). Patients achieving CR were eligible to receive two consolidations, with 3+7 (C#1) followed by mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 daily x 5 plus etoposide 100 mg/m2 IV daily x 5 (C#2). All patients underwent cardiac assessment prior to each cycle with MUGA scan. If the ejection fraction (EF) dropped to < 50% or had fallen by >10%, amsacrine (100 mg/m2 IV daily x 5) was substituted for the anthracycline. Consolidation was administered on an inpatient or outpatient basis according to physician discretion. Inpatient consolidations were administered to patients judged to have significant co-morbidities and poor PS post-induction, while the remaining patients were given consolidation on an outpatient basis, with twice weekly monitoring until hematologic recovery. Oral antibiotic and antifungal prophylaxis was used. Febrile neutropenia (FN) was treated with inpatient IV broad-spectrum antibiotics. Results: The median age of patients was 68 years (range, 60-84). 59 of 107 pts (55%) achieved a CR and a further 5 patients a leukemia free state with induction chemotherapy. 55 patients achieving CR proceeded to consolidation therapy on protocol. 38/55 pts. (69%) received C#1 as outpatient; the rate of admission for FN in these patients was 45%. 39/55 pts (71%) went on to receive a second consolidation cycle. Reasons for attrition post-C#1 included medically unfit (6 pts), persistent aplasia (3) and relapse (4). 32/39 (82%) pts received C#2 as outpatient; the rate of admission for FN was 59%. There were no treatment related deaths during consolidation therapy. Among patients proceeding to consolidation, 35/55 (63%) had a significant decline in LVEF during, or at completion of, treatment: >10% drop in LVEF in 31 pts. and LVEF <50% in 17 pts (7 of these to <40%); 24/35 pts received a change in consolidation chemotherapy as a result. At a median follow-up of 11.0 months, 80/107 (75%) have died; the median overall survival (OS) was 11.4 months, 3 year OS for all patients was 20%. For those patients obtaining CR, the median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 8.4 months. There was no significant difference in RFS and OS between patients switched to amsacrine versus those receiving standard protocol (p=0.15 and 0.31 respectively). Discussion: We have demonstrated that post-remission consolidation chemotherapy can be safely administered on an outpatient basis in the majority of otherwise medically fit elderly AML patients in CR-1 using this regimen. Approximately one half will require admission for febrile neutropenia, but treatment related mortality is low. Cardiac toxicity with this anthracycline-intensive regimen is significant, and close monitoring of LV function is required. Switching anthracycline drug to amsacrine during post-remission therapy does not appear to adversely affect outcome. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».