Abstract B15: Assessing the feasibility of an online cognitive health education program to address cognitive changes among breast cancer survivors
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Currently in the United States, there are an estimated 3.5 million breast cancer survivors (BCS), of which up to 75% in treatment and 35% after treatment report cognitive changes. To increase awareness of cognitive changes after treatment and promote healthy living to address those changes among BCS, Think Well: Healthy Living to Improve Cognitive Function (TW) was developed. The TW curriculum was evidence-based in knowledge of cognitive changes and potential compounding effects of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors (i.e., poor nutrition, lack of physical activity, and inadequate sleep hygiene), as well as complex issues occurring with return to work. The resulting TW program addressed cognitive health, cognitive changes after treatment, healthy living strategies to promote cognitive function (i.e., nutrition, physical activity, stress management, and sleep), brain exercises (i.e., crossword puzzles, problem solving, and learning new activities), and compensatory strategies (i.e., using a planner, setting reminders, and note taking). Through the use of community engagement, the TW program was delivered over a two year period (2014-2016) in community settings throughout North Central Alabama. Purpose: To assess the feasibility of disseminating a web-based TW. Methods: A web-based TW was developed from the existing evidence-based TW program consisting of: 1) cognitive changes after treatment; 2) healthy living strategies to promote cognitive function; 3) brain exercises; and 4) compensatory strategies. Delivery of the web-based TW was via the website (www.ThinkWell.tips) and employed: 1) videos; 3) downloadable tip sheets; 4) events calendar; and 4) links to other websites for additional resources. The website was launched October 15, 2015. Website use was measured via Google Analytics for the time period of October 15, 2015 - June 20, 2016. Results: Google Analytics revealed 1,546 sessions, 1,177 users, and 2,224 page views for the designated time period as well global users (i.e., United States, Russia, United Kingdom, China, Japan, Germany, Netherlands, Canada, and Brazil). The most visited pages included cognitive changes, nutrition, tip sheets, and events. Discussions/Conclusions: Results demonstrated that dissemination of a web-based TW was feasible and may have a global impact. To improve awareness of the TW website, future dissemination methods include distribution of business cards at professional/community events and engaging existing partners to disseminate via social media. Further TW website enhancements include a cognitive health blog and links to healthy living mobile applications and cognitive training platforms. Acknowledgement: Think Well is supported by a grant from the North Central Alabama Affiliate of Susan G. Komen. Authors are also supported by funding: Susan G. Komen Graduate Traineeship in Disparities Research, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Future of Nursing Scholarship, American Cancer Society Doctoral Degree Scholarship in Cancer Nursing (DSCN-15-073-01 and DSCN-16-066-01), Jonas Nurse Leaders Scholarship, and Gladys Farmer Colvin Doctoral Fellowship. Citation Format: Jennifer Bail, Timiya S. Nolan, Jacqueline Bui, Silvia Gisiger-Camata, Karen Meneses. Assessing the feasibility of an online cognitive health education program to address cognitive changes among breast cancer survivors. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Ninth AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2016 Sep 25-28; Fort Lauderdale, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017;26(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B15.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».