MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2591091210 · doi:10.18260/1-2--4219

Engaging First Year Students In Engineering Design Through Engineers Without Borders

2020· article· en· W2591091210 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueEngineering Education and Pedagogy
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCapstoneEngineering educationEngineering design processAccreditationSituatedProcess (computing)EngineeringHealth systems engineeringEngineering managementEngineering ethicsCivil engineeringComputer scienceMechanical engineeringMedical education

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract NOTE: The first page of text has been automatically extracted and included below in lieu of an abstract Engaging First Year Students in Engineering Design through Engineers Without Borders Projects Abstract It is important that first year engineering students learn that the engineering design process involves more than mathematics and physics. To accomplish this, students choose design projects from a variety of disciplines, developed with Engineers Without Borders (Canada) and situated in either a developing country or a remote area of Canada. All projects required, not only a technical solution, but also consideration of ethics, health and safety, economics, and impact on the community. Among the design projects were a rain-water harvesting system and ceramic water filter for villagers in Cambodia and a press for extracting oil and producing biodiesel fuel from seeds of the Jatropha shrub, which grows in West Africa. The impact of this approach on student satisfaction and success is discussed. Introduction A central focus of engineering education is the design process. Our goal as engineering educators is to ensure that graduating engineers have the ability to “design effective solutions that meet societal needs” 1. Traditionally, engineering education is built on a foundation of sciences and mathematics courses, with students taking engineering courses in their upper years, with few students experiencing design outside of a focused course in their discipline. In the 1990’s, in response to accreditation criteria, most engineering schools added a “capstone” design project in the final year. These projects are meant to be complex, have a “real world” flavor, and are often multi-disciplinary. In some cases, there are industrial sponsors and students work closely with practicing engineers. As engineering education has evolved in the last decade, the concept of a “cornerstone” or first- year engineering design project has been added. The goal of these projects is to give students early exposure to the engineering profession2-4, the engineering design process5, and the diversity of engineering disciplines; all while keeping their excitement, enthusiasm, and enjoyment levels high. Teaching first-year students about the engineering approach to problem-solving and design provides them with a framework within which to apply core scientific knowledge and mathematical skills they are acquiring in other courses. As part of our Introduction to Professional Engineering course, small groups of students work together on design projects. Students choose from a set of topics that reflect the diverse engineering disciplines within our faculty. The project descriptions were developed in collaboration with Engineers Without Borders (Canada) and are set in either a developing country or a remote area of Canada. In addition to the technical aspects of the engineering design, the final reports and presentations address considerations such as ethics, healthy and safety, economics, and impact on the community. Design projects included, for example, a rain-water harvesting system, a ceramic water filter, a seed press to extract oil, and a process for converting seed oil into biodiesel fuel in communities such as Lehkbooan, Cambodia and Changnayili, Ghana.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,910
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,290
Écart entre enseignants0,256 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

En bref

Citations4
Publié2020
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetEngineering Education and PedagogyTravaux en français237 207