Good Faith: English Hostility, Unworkable Obligations for Commerce, or a Healthy Development? What to Expect in Canada?
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
On 30 October 2016, a significant new landmark in international trade was reached by the signing of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement, the CETA, between the European Union, the EU, and Canada. In an over 1,000 pages long document, the parties outline details on how to ‘strengthen their close economic relationship, … create an expanded and secure market for their goods and services through the reduction or elimination of barriers to trade and investment, [and] establish clear, transparent, predictable and mutually advantageous rules to govern their trade and investment’. In accordance to the Joint Interpretative Instrument on the CETA the agreement ‘embodies the shared commitment of Canada and the European Union and its Member States to free and fair trade’ and ‘creates new opportunities for trade and investment for Europeans and Canadians’. In respect to small- and medium-size enterprises, ‘for whom trying to meet the cost requirements of customers is a constant challenge’ the document specifically states that the CETA will allow ‘virtually all manufactured goods to be exported duty-free’. Notwithstanding the severe opposition that signing of this agreement has met on both sides of the Atlantic, the initiative is also met with positive tones. Although it is too early to say, as to what extend the CETA will contribute to the expansion of trade between the signing parties, it is expected that far more contracts will be signed and agreements entered into between businesses incorporated in Canada and the EU, respectively. Businesses in the civil law continental Europe are used to the concept of good faith in negotiations and subsequent performance of their contractual obligations. Businesses in the common law jurisdictions, however, have a quite different view to that regard. Canada has inherited its contract law principles from the United Kingdom. On the question of good faith, however, it seems like the jurisdiction is departing – albeit cautiously – and moving away from the traditional English hostility towards good faith in contractual obligations, thus, creating its path and a unique conception of it. This article will attempt to elucidate some important aspects of the current developments in connection to good faith in Canada. Hopefully, the article will provide some guidance in how to understand good faith and what to expect in a Canadian business and legal environment to avoid misunderstandings and unpleasant consequences that potentially could arise from that.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle