MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2592026758 · doi:10.1111/aogs.13100

International Women's Day – all changes matter

2017· editorial· en· W2592026758 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Karen R. Wøjdemann, Chiara Benedetto, Seija Grénman

Notice bibliographique

RevueActa Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica · 2017
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésShameMedicineParliamentGender studiesHuman rightsEconomic growthPolitical sciencePsychologyPoliticsSociologySocial psychologyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The idea of an International Women's day was proposed and approved in Copenhagen in 1910 by 100 women from 17 countries including the first three women elected to the Finnish parliament. A year later, more than one million women and men in Austria, Denmark, Germany and Switzerland attended rallies to improve gender equality and International Women's Day was marked for the first time on March 19 that same year. Since 1975, the day has been celebrated by the United Nations on March 8. The focus has changed during the last century and more efforts have been invested in women's right to work, vote and improving their access to education and health care. In the Nordic countries, although we have not achieved gender parity in all areas of life, we are much closer to this aim than women in developing countries. However, some issues are global and often unspoken. Women and men in all countries and from all socio-economic backgrounds may be subject to domestic violence. Psychological and emotional abuses are often difficult to recognize, because the survivors try to hide it until the very end. Bringing up domestic violence can be difficult due to shame, guilt and the risk of stigmatization. Sometimes simply asking the question: "Have you faced physical, psychological or sexual violence in your intimate relationship?" can be key in helping your patient. The theme for International Women's day 2017 is "Be bold for change: help forge a better working world – a more gender inclusive world". Being bold may feel unfamiliar and even like a challenge for some of us, but it was most certainly a necessity for our ancestors and still is for many people, especially women, around the world to achieve basic rights such as access to health care. So how can we be bold for change? Taking steps from raising awareness to concrete action should be our goal, both locally and globally. The most important thing is to be aware and act. When we hear that one woman out of three has been beaten, coerced into sex, or otherwise abused in her lifetime, that one woman every two minutes still dies from pregnancy related causes and childbirth (http://www.unfpa.org/maternal-health), about 225 million have an unmet need for family planning (http://who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs351/en/) and more than 200 million girls and women alive today have undergone female genital mutilation worldwide (http://www.unfpa.org/female-genital-mutilation), we need to consider how we can best help these women. To join forces with different stakeholders could help us to accelerate the process of achieving gender parity, which means a better quality of life for everybody. Different geographical areas have specific challenges in respecting human rights and trying to achieve gender equality. In all countries and societies there is a need to overcome conscious and unconscious biases. This must be kept in mind when we bring up our children, teach medical students and search for academic or political leaders. Unfortunately, the political situation is unstable in several countries and joint efforts are needed to meet even the basic needs of life. It has been estimated that the current global number of refugees is over 10 million, of which over 50% are women. This means that millions of women, men and children are victims of war and subjected to random, arbitrary violence and abuse at refugee camps or when displaced in their country of origin. We are all willing to help as individuals and as organizations. NFOG, FIGO and their member societies can offer their knowledge and expertise to meet the unique needs of women in these extreme conditions. A week before Women's Day, FIGO will be running a communication campaign, based on the work of the FIGO Committee on Women's Health and Human Rights. The campaign will focus on different topics of importance each day: Adoption of a Healthy Lifestyle, Prevention of Sexually Transmitted Infections, Contraception, Preconception Counselling, Safe Pregnancy and Delivery, Fertility Preservation, Prevention of Gender-based Violence. It will end on March 8 with the topic of Respectful Behavior, which is the basis for improvement in all areas of human rights including gender equality. Obstetricians and gynecologists are in a unique and privileged position within efforts to improve the living conditions of women and families worldwide. We should make use of this opportunity. In addition to our professional work, we can raise our voice in public debates, on social media or even in our children's schools; all changes matter. Fetal Therapy Course, Stockholm, Sweden on 22-23 April 2017 (http://fetalcareacademy.org) World Congress on Endometriosis, Vancouver, Canada on 17-20 May 2017 (http://endometriosis.ca/world-congress/wce2017/) Nordic Network for Fetal Medicine (NNFM) meeting, Helsinki, Finland on 18-19 May 2017 (http://www.nnfm.org) International Society of Placenta Associations (IFPA) meeting, Manchester, UK on 30 August to 2 September 2017 (http://www.ifpa2017.org) AAGL Global Endometriosis Summit, Reykjavik, Iceland on 20-21 July 2017 (https://www.aagl.org/iceland/)

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,007
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,074
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,248

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0070,013
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,008
Communication savante0,0170,014
Science ouverte0,0020,012
Intégrité de la recherche0,0100,018
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0740,030

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,029
Tête enseignante GPT0,317
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueActa Obstetricia Et Gynecologica ScandinavicaMême sujetGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyTravaux en français237 207