MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2592210126 · doi:10.22037/anm.v23i83.7026

Icu nurses attitude to evidence based practice in Ardebil University of Medical Science’s hospitalsin1391

2014· article· en· W2592210126 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
fereshteh Zolriasatein, farahvash Parvindarabad, Zhila Abedsaeedi, ahmad reza Baqestani

Notice bibliographique

RevueAdvances in nursing and midwifery · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueHealth Sciences Research and Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedical scienceMedical educationPsychologyMedicineNursing

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background and aim: The evidence-based practice is the main objective of policy, management and training of health care in developed countries and significant investment has been done to develop it. Cause of high quality care providing importance in the ICU, it is necessary to familiarize nurses with the evidence in care. Awareness of nurse’s attitude allows changing and improving their approach. This study aimed to determine attitudes of nurses working in educational medical science hospitals ICUs in Ardabil city. Materials and methods: In this descriptive study, 234 ICU nurses have selected with census method. To measure the attitude,questionnaire form that its validity was determined by content validity and its reliability was determined by using Cronbach’s alpha(α = 0. 78) have used. Data analysis was performed with the software spss18. Results: Most nurseshad positive attitudes toevidence-basedcaresandevidencevalidityand its useinclinicalcareandnegativeattitudestotheimportanceofcilinicalexperience. There is a significant relation between level of education, clinical experience, training and management, survey quantity, access to result of research, with mean of attitude score. Conclusions: Despite positive attitudes to evidence-based practice and its clinical use, access to research evidence and use is low. Keywords: Evidence based practice, Attitud, ICU, Nurse REFERENCES Aghahoseini SH (2011) [Nurses ‘knowledge and attitude in evidence-based nursing in kashan university of medical sciences’ teaching hospitals]. Tabriz Nursing & Midwifery Journal . 6(2) 45-54 (Persian) Beyea SC ,Slattery M j(2006) Evidence-based Practice in Nursing: A Guide to Successful Implementation Hcpro, Inc. Breimaier H E , Halfens RJG M, Lohrmann C (2010) Nurses’ wishes, knowledge, attitudes and perceived barriers on implementing research findings into practice among graduate nurses in Austria. Journal of Clinical Nursing . 20(11-12)1744-56 Brown CE , Kim sc, Stichler JF,Fields W (2010) Predictors of knowledge, attitudes,use and future use of evidence- based practice among baccalaureate nursing students at two universities. Nurse Education Today . 30(6) 521-527 Bucknal TK (2003) The clinical landscape of critical care: nurses , decision – making Journal of Advanced Nursing. 43(3)310-319 Camiah S (1997) Utilization of nursing research in practice and application strategies to raise research awerness among nurse practitioner: a model for success. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 26(1)193-202 Courtney M (2005) Evidence for Nursing Practice. Elsevier Australia. Cullum N, Ciliska D,Haynes B, Marks S(2010) [Evidence-Based Nursing: An Introduction]. Translated by: SedaqatiM,Hamedi S. 1rst Edition. Tehran. Salemi Publisher. (Persian). Egerod I, Hansen G M. (2004) Evidence-based practice among Danish cardiac nurses: a national survey. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 51(5) 465–473 Estrabrooks C. A (1998) Will evidence based practice make practice perfect? Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 30(1) 15-36 HabibiSh, RezaeiHachesoo P, Tabaghi R (2010) [ Enhancing information literacy as a base of developing evidence-based nursing]. Health Information Management. 7(3) 371-378)Persian) Hockenbery M, Wilson D, Barrera P (2006) Implementing evidence based nursing practice in a pediatric hospital. Pediatric Nursing. 32(4)371-377 JalaliniaF. The consequences of qualitative and quantitative evidence-based education in nursing students: a study of the combination. The Ph. D. thesis in nursing. Baqiyatallah university of medical sciences. (2011))Persian) KermanshahiS , Parvinian A M (2012) [Barriers to implementation of evidence-based care: Viewpoints of nursing staff]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 12(2): 84-92)Persian) Killen M B, Barnfather J S (2005) A successful teaching strategy for applying evidence based practice. Nurse Educator. 30(3) 127-132 Koessl B D. (2009). Factors Influencing Rural Nurses Attitudes and Beliefs Toward Evidence Based Practice,. A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Nursing. Montana State University. Koehn M , Lehman K (2008) Nurses perceptions of evidence based nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 62(2) 215-209 Koivunen M, Valimaki M ,Hatonenn H (2010) Nurses’ information retrieval skills in psychiatric hospitals– Are the requirements for evidence – based practice fulfilled ? Nurse Education in Practice. 10(1)27-31 Kothari A, Birch S, Charles C (2005) “Interaction” and research utilization in health policies and programs: Does it work? Health Policy. 71(1) 117–125 Krugman M (2003) Evidence – based practice: The role of staff development. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development. 19(6) 279-285 Lai NM , Teng CL, lee ML (2010) The place and barriers of evidence based practice: knowledge and perceptions of medical , nursing and allied health practitioners in malaysia. BMC Research Notes. 3: 279 MehrdadN , Salsali M, Kazemnejad A (2007) [Nurses’ attitudes toward research utilization in clinical practice]. Hayat. 13(2): 41-52)Persian) NezamzadehM,Nouri J Khademolhosseini SM(2011)[ Quality of nursing evidence based guidelines from the nurses view]. Iranian Journal of Critical care Nursing. 4(1)53-58)Persian) O’Donnell CA(2004) Attitudes and knowledge of primary care professionals towards evidence-based practice: a postal survey. Journal of Evaluating Clinical Practice. 10(3) 197-205. Polit D F, Beck C T (2008) Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice. 8nd Edition. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. Rodgers S (1994) An exploratory study of research utilization by nurses in general medical and surgical wards. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 20(4) 904-911 Rycroft – Malone J et al (2004) An exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence in to practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing 13(8) 913-924 Smith R (1996) What cilinical information do doctors need? British Medical Journal. 313(7064) 1068-1062 Soltani A (2007)[Evidence Based Medicine]. 1rst Edition. Tehran. Tehran university publisher. )Persian) Tahmasebifard N, Nakhshab M, Shafiei M (2012)[A primary study on the attitude, knowledge and behavior of speech and language pathologists toward evidence-based practice]. Journal of Research In Rehabilitation Sciences. 8(1) 65-76)Persian) Wallin L , Bostrom AM , Wikblad K , Edwald U (2003) Sustainability in changing clinical practice promotes evidence-based nursing care. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 41(5) 509-518

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,013
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,616
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,995

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,013
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,056
Tête enseignante GPT0,531
Écart entre enseignants0,475 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAdvances in nursing and midwiferyMême sujetHealth Sciences Research and EducationTravaux en français237 207