The role of mobile phone-based interventions to improve routine childhood immunisation coverage
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Routine childhood immunisation is one of the most successful and cost-effective public health interventions that have considerably reduced global child morbidity and mortality.1Shen AK Fields R McQuestion M The future of routine immunization in the developing world: challenges and opportunities.Glob Health Sci Pract. 2014; 2: 381-394Crossref PubMed Scopus (66) Google Scholar However, annually, an estimated 18·7 million children under 1 year of age do not receive basic vaccination as part of an expanded programme of immunisation (EPI) worldwide, and millions of children die from vaccine-preventable diseases.2WHOImmunization coverage.http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs378/en/Google Scholar Because of social issues and insufficient appreciation for immunisation, parents and caregivers forget or ignore the importance of immunisation or completing the entire series of vaccines. As a consequence, there is a continuation of the polio epidemic, large measles outbreaks, and high disease burden of vaccine-preventable diseases in children.3Owais A Hanif B Siddiqui A Agha A Zaidi A Does improving maternal knowledge of vaccines impact infant immunization rates? A community-based randomized-controlled trial in Karachi, Pakistan.BMC Public Health. 2011; 11: 239Crossref PubMed Scopus (115) Google Scholar In The Lancet Global Health, Dustin Gibson and colleagues study4Mobile phone delivered reminders and incentives to improve childhood immunisation coverage and timeliness in Kenya (M-SIMU): a cluster randomised controlled trial.Lancet Global Health. 2017; 5: e428-e438Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar showed the effectiveness of SMS reminders coupled with incentives in improving immunisation uptake and timelines in Kenya.4Mobile phone delivered reminders and incentives to improve childhood immunisation coverage and timeliness in Kenya (M-SIMU): a cluster randomised controlled trial.Lancet Global Health. 2017; 5: e428-e438Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar The rapidly growing advancements in mobile technology have revolutionised global connectivity with 7 billion mobile phone users worldwide, most of which live in developing countries.5Kazi AM Carmichael JL Hapanna GW et al.Assessing mobile phone access and perceptions for texting-based mHealth interventions among expectant mothers and child caregivers in remote regions of northern Kenya: a survey-based descriptive study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017; 3: e5Crossref PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar The element of portability and sharing allows mobile phones to reach more people than through the internet alone, providing a great solution to challenges such as travel and complex intercultural contact.5Kazi AM Carmichael JL Hapanna GW et al.Assessing mobile phone access and perceptions for texting-based mHealth interventions among expectant mothers and child caregivers in remote regions of northern Kenya: a survey-based descriptive study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017; 3: e5Crossref PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar, 6Kazi A Murtaza A Khoja S Zaidi A Ali S Monitoring polio supplementary immunization activities using an automated short text messaging system in Karachi, Pakistan.Bull World Health Organ. 2013; 92: 220-225Crossref PubMed Scopus (27) Google Scholar A substantial proportion of the population living below the poverty line has access to mobile phones.5Kazi AM Carmichael JL Hapanna GW et al.Assessing mobile phone access and perceptions for texting-based mHealth interventions among expectant mothers and child caregivers in remote regions of northern Kenya: a survey-based descriptive study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017; 3: e5Crossref PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar This has thus changed the mode of communication among people worldwide and provides a great potential for public health engagement. Mobile health (mHealth) and SMS-based interventions have successfully improved vaccination uptake in children.7Haji A Lowther S Ngan'ga Z et al.Reducing routine vaccination dropout rates: evaluating two interventions in three Kenyan districts, 2014.BMC Public Health. 2016; 16: 152Crossref PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar Although incentives have been used before to improve health-care outcomes, Gibson and colleagues' study showed a statistically significant effect of mobile phone-based incentives coupled with SMS for improving immunisation coverage and timelines in a low and middle-income country (LMIC) setup.4Mobile phone delivered reminders and incentives to improve childhood immunisation coverage and timeliness in Kenya (M-SIMU): a cluster randomised controlled trial.Lancet Global Health. 2017; 5: e428-e438Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar Given the mobile phone access and acceptability in LMICs, there is considerable potential for mobile phone-based interventions to improve immunisation coverage in such settings. Previous studies assessing the effect of texting on vaccination have largely focused on flu vaccination in children and adolescents in the USA.8Stockwell M Kharbanda E Martinez RA Vargas CY Vawdrey DK Camargo S Effect of a text messaging intervention on influenza vaccination in an urban, low-income pediatric and adolescent population.JAMA. 2012; 307: 1702Crossref PubMed Scopus (258) Google Scholar There are limited data from LMICs on the role of mHealth-based SMS interventions in improving routine childhood immunisation coverage.7Haji A Lowther S Ngan'ga Z et al.Reducing routine vaccination dropout rates: evaluating two interventions in three Kenyan districts, 2014.BMC Public Health. 2016; 16: 152Crossref PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar Most of these studies assessed the conventional one-way text reminders and only a few studies compared reminder messages with educational and interactive (two-way) SMS messages related to vaccination uptake.9Oyo-Ita A Wiysonge CS Oringanje C Nwachukwu CE Oduwole O Meremikwu MM Interventions for improving coverage of childhood immunisation in low- and middle-income countries.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; 7 (CD008145)PubMed Google Scholar However, in Gibson and colleagues' study SMS reminders as a stand-alone intervention did not improve immunisation coverage and the effect was only seen when SMS was combined with an incentive.4Mobile phone delivered reminders and incentives to improve childhood immunisation coverage and timeliness in Kenya (M-SIMU): a cluster randomised controlled trial.Lancet Global Health. 2017; 5: e428-e438Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar Results from the present study also showed improvement in timelines for measles immunisation, which is scheduled at 9 months of age, almost a gap of 6 months from the last vaccine according to EPI schedule for LMICs.4Mobile phone delivered reminders and incentives to improve childhood immunisation coverage and timeliness in Kenya (M-SIMU): a cluster randomised controlled trial.Lancet Global Health. 2017; 5: e428-e438Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar Although the major focus up until now has been on reminder messages, the impact of educational or provoking messages and automated calls for vaccination coverage improvement might also have a high bearing and should be further explored. Furthermore, very few studies have looked at the feasibility of conditional cash transfer through mobile phones for improving immunisation timelines.10Wakadha H Chandir S Were EV et al.The feasibility of using mobile-phone based SMS reminders and conditional cash transfers to improve timely immunization in rural Kenya.Vaccine. 2013; 31: 987-993Crossref PubMed Scopus (84) Google Scholar One major reservation for SMS-based interventions is the level of literacy of the caregivers receiving the message. Preference for phone calls over text messages in populations with low literacy and resource-constrained settings has been shown in a few studies.5Kazi AM Carmichael JL Hapanna GW et al.Assessing mobile phone access and perceptions for texting-based mHealth interventions among expectant mothers and child caregivers in remote regions of northern Kenya: a survey-based descriptive study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2017; 3: e5Crossref PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar Findings from a pilot study assessing the supplementary immunisation coverage using SMS text and automated calls showed a much higher response to the automated call (78%) than SMS text messages (3%; personal communication). Mobile phone text messages in local languages, pictorial messages, and automated phone calls or interactive voice recording according to the local settings can also play an important part in improvement of routine childhood immunisation. Additionally, adding incentives, both as mobile money or airtime, can also have a positive influence on the immunisation coverage. Gibson and colleagues showed the greatest effect for improvement in coverage and timelines in the incentive group that received the equivalent of US$2.4Mobile phone delivered reminders and incentives to improve childhood immunisation coverage and timeliness in Kenya (M-SIMU): a cluster randomised controlled trial.Lancet Global Health. 2017; 5: e428-e438Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (95) Google Scholar However, there is a cost implication for scaling and sustainability of this model at the country or programme level. Nonetheless, improving immunisation uptake according to the schedule and in time will not only decrease mortality and morbidity but also reduce supplementary immunisation activities. Mobile phone-based interventions have a great potential to connect routine childhood immunisation services with parents and caregivers, particularly for resource constraint settings. However, a clear policy on mHealth-based interventions related to routine childhood immunisation, including conditional cash transfer through mobile phones needs to be explored. Furthermore, in order to scale up mHealth-based interventions, mobile phone numbers registries of caregivers of children eligible for routine childhood immunisation should be established while preserving privacy and confidentiality. New innovative and cost-effective approaches are required that will enhance communication, engagement in care, and coordination between care-seekers and health-care providers to improve routine childhood immunisation coverage in LMICs settings. I declare no competing interests. Mobile phone-delivered reminders and incentives to improve childhood immunisation coverage and timeliness in Kenya (M-SIMU): a cluster randomised controlled trialIn a setting with high baseline immunisation coverage levels, SMS reminders coupled with incentives significantly improved immunisation coverage and timeliness. Given that global immunisation coverage levels have stagnated around 85%, the use of incentives might be one option to reach the remaining 15%. Full-Text PDF Open Access
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».