Uptake of Factor V by Megakaryocytes Requires a Specific Factor V Receptor Linked to a Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Factor V is endocytosed by megakaryocytes from plasma to form the platelet-derived factor V/Va pool via a receptor-mediated, clathrin-dependent mechanism. However, the megakaryocyte receptor that mediates the binding and subsequent endocytosis of plasma-derived factor V is unknown. Because of its known ability to interact with proteins involved in coagulation and fibrinolysis, the role of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) or an LRP-like molecule was examined in factor V endocytosis by the megakaryocyte-like cell line CMK. As endocytosis by such proteins is Ca2+-dependent, binding and endocytosis of factor V ± added Ca2+ were examined. While endocytosis of factor V was absolutely dependent upon the presence of Ca2+, binding of factor V to megakaryocytes was unaffected by its absence allowing for the quantification of 125I-factor V binding in the absence of factor V endocytosis. The time-dependent, specific 125I-factor V binding to megakaryocytes reached a steady-state within 20–25 min and displayed a sigmoidal character. The steady state binding of a plasma concentration of 125I-factor V could be displaced 56.4 ± 7.8% by the addition of a 150-fold molar excess of the LRP ligand, receptor associated protein (RAP). In contrast, nearly all of the 125I-factor V bound could be displaced following the addition of a 50-fold molar excess of factor V alone or by the addition of both factor V and RAP. These observations suggest that factor V binds to two binding sites on megakaryocytes, which consist of a specific factor V receptor and LRP (or an LRP-like molecule). This notion of a two-receptor system was confirmed in steady state, concentration-dependent binding analyses of 125I-factor V in the presence or absence of RAP. Binding of factor V was saturable at a concentration ~15–20 times higher than the plasma concentration of factor V, which is consistent with observations that the platelet-derived factor V concentration is dependent upon and parallels the plasma-derived factor V concentration. Similar to the observations described above, concentration-dependent binding was also inhibited 40–50% by the presence of excess RAP. The binding curves in the presence or absence of RAP remained sigmoidal and were fit with confidence (r ≥ 0.95) to a two-receptor binding model. In support of these observations, AlexaFluor488-labeled factor V and AlexaFluor633-labeled RAP co-localized within the same cells subsequent to their endocytosis by megakaryocytes as demonstrated by confocal microscopy. Flow cytometric analyses of the same cell population confirmed these observations: All of the cells that endocytosed factor V also endocytosed RAP. Based upon the combined observations we propose a binding model where factor V endocytosis is mediated by a two-receptor system consisting of a specific factor V receptor and an LRP co-receptor closely linked on the cell surface. In this model, factor V binds to its specific receptor in a Ca2+-independent manner. Bound factor V is then transferred to LRP (or an LRP-like molecule) to allow for the binding of a second factor V molecule to the unoccupied site on the factor V receptor. Factor V bound to LRP is then endocytosed in Ca2+- and clathrin-dependent manners. As our flow cytometric analyses indicate that all of the cells bind and endocytose RAP, we hypothesize that it is the presence or absence of the specific factor V receptor that defines the megakaryocytes’ ability to endocytose factor V from plasma.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».