MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2592534991 · doi:10.1111/jsr.12517

Sleep and breathing disorders

2017· editorial· en· W2592534991 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dieter Riemann

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Sleep Research · 2017
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueObstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMeta-analysisMedicineObstructive sleep apneaHypopneaSleep apneaWaistApneaSleep disordered breathingOrthodonticsCardiologyPolysomnographyInternal medicineObesity

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A major focus of this issue of JSR is devoted to the topic of respiratory sleep medicine—as many as seven papers stem from this discipline of clinical sleep medicine. Agha and Johal (2017), probably for the first time ever, present a systematic review and meta-analysis on facial phenotypes in obstructive sleep apnea–hypopnea syndrome (OSAS). Interestingly, and as expected, for neck circumference five studies with a total of 906 participants (included in the analysis) showed increased mean differences compared to control subjects. However, the authors noted extensive heterogeneity between the analysed studies. Only two studies, with a sum of 467 participants, looked at other parameters such as mandible length, mandible width, lower facial height and anterior mandible height parameters. The pooled results demonstrated that OSAS was coupled with larger parameters than controls. Summarizing, this systematic review and meta-analysis can be seen as a first step in the right direction—combining data from several studies and meta-analysing them is usually very useful to bring structure into a field and to evaluate which findings are stable or not. Concluding, it might be said that further research is necessary, especially according to well-devised guidelines on how to measure facial phenotype, in order to develop a more solid data base. Two papers in this issue (Chang et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2017) look at the relationship between snoring, sleep apnea and atherosclerosis. Kim et al. measured carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in a sample of 180 non-apneic and non-snorers (snoring was recorded objectively by a microphone). The study showed that mean carotid IMT increased with the severity of snoring in females, but not in males. Thus, the authors conclude that ‘snoring during at least one-fourth of a night's sleep is associated independently with sub-clinical changes in carotid intima-media thickness in women but not in men’. Chang et al. measured, among other parameters, carotid IMT in 121 OSA patients (without metabolic syndrome) and 27 controls. It was shown that, in the patients with OSA, mean systolic blood pressure and other parameters correlated independently with carotid IMT. This is worth noting, because the investigated sample of patients with OSA was selected specifically for not having a metabolic syndrome. A second major focus of this issue of JSR originates from investigations into sleep–wake homeostasis, circadian rhythms and chronobiology. In a careful polysomnographic study in 11 healthy young adults, the Zurich group (Rusterholz et al., 2017) looked at interindividual differences in the dynamics of the homeostatic ‘Process S’. They found that the time constants of the build-up and dissipation of Process S varied independently among subjects, indicating two distinct traits. The authors concluded that the interindividual differences in the parameters of the dynamics of the sleep homeostatic Process S are trait-like. Another highlight comes from the same group (Borbély et al., 2017). Here, Alexander Borbély, one of the founding fathers of European sleep research, presents his own personal data of actigraphy collected over a period of more than 3 decades, starting in 1982. This is probably the largest single case data set ever published on actigraphic measurements. Interestingly, as the data set includes data during active work (before retirement) and after retirement, differences between these two periods of life became obvious. Before retirement there was a dominant 7-day rhythm of sleep duration as well as an annual periodicity (revealed by spectral analysis). These variations were attenuated or vanished during the years after retirement. Several papers looked at school-aged children, students or young adults. Gariepy et al. (2017) report data from Canada about school starting times and sleep in Canadian adolescents. Data were taken from 362 schools from almost 30 000 students aged 10–18 years. Mean school starting time was 08:43 hours and varied from 07:57 to 09:37 hours. Students slept an average of 8:36 hours on weeknights and 9:45 at weekends. As expected, bedtimes shifted to later times at the end of the week (for more than 3 h at weekends compared to weeknights). Interestingly, the data analysis showed that students with later school times slept more and were less likely to report feeling tired in the morning. This study adds weight to the mounting evidence that delaying school start time may benefit adolescent sleep and wake patterns.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,020
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMétarecherche, Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,219
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,020
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,011
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,040
Tête enseignante GPT0,407
Écart entre enseignants0,368 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Sleep ResearchMême sujetObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchTravaux en français237 207