A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study Comparing Lower-Dose Intravenous Immune Globulin (IVIg) (1 g/kg) to Higher-Dose Ivig (2 g/kg) in Adult Immune Thrombocytopenia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 3324 Background Intravenous immune globulin (IVIg) is a standard first line treatment for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The optimal total dose for adults is not clear, and historically, many centers have used a total dose of 2 g/kg. However, the most recent evidence-based guidelines from ASH recommend an initial dose of 1g/kg, with an additional dose in cases with lack of response (Neunert et al, Blood, 2011). Based on this guideline, our tertiary care centre decreased the initial dose of IVIg in adults with severe ITP from 2 g/kg to 1 g/kg in June 2011. Rationale To date, there is no robust level I or II evidence to indicate the optimal dosing of IVIg in adult ITP. The objective of this study is to examine the effect of the change to 1 g/kg on clinical and laboratory outcomes at our centre. Methods All patients ≥18 years who received IVIg for ITP at our centre between April 2007 and June 2012 were identified. Patients who had received IVIg treatment within a year prior to the current course of therapy or treatment with concurrent platelet transfusions were excluded. Patients who received more than one treatment during the study period were included only once in the first episode in our analysis. The primary outcome was overall response, defined as a doubling of platelets within 7 days from before IVIg treatment to a minimum of ≥ 30 ×109/L. Secondary outcomes included peak platelet count achieved, average length of hospital stay, relapse, and requirement of rescue therapy within 30 days. Relapse was defined as loss of response (platelets < 30 × 109/L, bleeding or need for rescue therapy) after initial achievement of response within 90 days. Rescue therapy included subsequent platelet transfusion, steroids, repeat IVIg, anti-D, rituximab or splenectomy. Patient characteristics and outcomes were compared between the 2 g/kg and the 1g/kg group using Chi-squared analysis for categorical variables and 2-sided t-tests for continuous variables. Results 75 patients were identified, of which 59 met the inclusion criteria. 45 of the included patients had been treated with higher dose IVIg (average of 2.01 g/kg) and 16 received a lower dose (average of 0.92 g/kg). The baseline characteristics between the two groups including age, gender, weight, secondary causes of ITP (drug-related: 13.3% vs. 0%, p = 0.295; viral-related: 17.8% vs. 25%, p = 0.798; autoimmune disease: 17.8% vs.6.3%, p = 0.482; hematological disorder: 6.7% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.595; other: 2.2% vs. 6.3% p = 0.979), duration of IVIg treatment (2.3 ± 0.13 days vs. 1.1± 0.06 days), and initial platelet count in both groups were similar at diagnosis. No significant differences were observed between patients in the higher-dose group and those in the lower-dose group with respect to: overall response rate (93% vs. 81%, p=0.18), peak platelet count (173 ± 19×109/L vs. 146 ± 39×109/L p=0.37), average length of hospital stay (3.6 ± 0.4 days vs. 4.5 ± 1.9 days p=0.47), relapse (60.0% vs. 43.8% p=0.38), and requirement of rescue therapy within 30 days (37.8% vs. 43.8% low-dose p=0.77). Furthermore, there were no significant differences observed in the probability of maintained response between the two groups. Conclusion These results suggest that adult patients diagnosed with ITP can be treated with an initial IVIg dose of 1g/kg with comparable outcomes to 2g/kg. A sufficiently powered randomized controlled trial is necessary to confirm these findings. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».