Green Accounting of China: Comparison Analysis between 1992 and 1995/COMPTABILITE VERTE DE LA CHINE : ANALYSE COMPARATIVE ENTRE 1992 ET 1995
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract: On the basis of the general framework of United Nations' accounting system-integrated system of environment & economy accounting SEEA (1992 /2000/2003) (UN, 1992/2000/2003) and 93'SNA (UN,1993), the specific objectives of this paper is try to construct one simple, effective and practical integrated system of environment & economy accounting of China (CSEEA), and thereby trial estimate of the 1992/1995 Chinese environmental adjusted GDP (Green GDP) is given, under Chinese National Accounting System's reform practice. Key words: SEEA, integrated system of environment & economy accounting of China, Green GDP, SNA Resume: Sur la base du cadre general du systeme de comptabilite « indirect/satellite » des Nations Unies-systeme integre de comptabilite environnementale et economique SEEA (1992 /2000/2003) (UN, 1992/2000/2003) et 93'SNA (UN,1993), l'objectif de l'article present consiste a construire un systeme integre de comptabilite environnementale et economique de Chine (CSEEA) simple, efficace et pratique. Ainsi, l'estimation du PIB vert de Chine 1992/1995 est donne, sous la reforme du Systeme de Comptabilite national de Chine. Mots-Cles: SEEA, systeme integre de comptabilite environnementale et economique de Chine, PIB, SNA 1. INTRODUCTION The discussion of integrated accounting for environment and economy under the framework of sustainable development has received increased attention by the international society, since the report of the World Commission on Environmental and Development was published in 1987. This heightening interest led to the proposal contained in Agenda 21 of the United Nations Conference on Environmental and Development (Rio de Janiero Earth Summit 1992) to encourage the development of integrated system environmental and economy accounting. In China, such proposal was also contained in the following Chinese Agenda 21 which was put forward in 1993. In 1993, United Nation revised its traditional 68'SNA and developed one general framework of integrated system environmental and economy accounting (SEEA) as a part of this revision. Till now, various components of the SEEA have been tested in case studies in the world. The work not only accumulated many good experience of construction of the concrete national SEEA but also demonstrate further that SEEA is an efficient system which can provide a valuable information base for integrated development and planning policy. According to that, revised versions of 1993'SEEA were put forwarded by UN in 2000 (UN, 2000) and 2003 (UN, 2003), respectively. Under this situation, it's doubtless an urgent and important task to develop a simple, effective and practical integrated system of environment & economy accounting of China (CSEEA), which is consistent with the Chinese SNA framework and capable of assessing the burden of economic activities on the natural resources and environment in China today. On the basis of the United Nation's General Framework of Integrated System Environ- mental and Economy Accounting (1992/2000/2003) (UN, 1992/2000/2003) and 93'SNA (UN, 1993) and Chinese National Accounting System's reform (1992/2002) practice (CNSB, 1992/2002), the specific objectives of this study is try to construct one simple, effective and practical integrated system of environment & economy accounting of China (CSEEA), and thereby estimate the 1992/1995 Chinese environmental adjusted GDP (Green GDP). This study is further research on the basis of our one former works on Green input-output accounting for natural resources-economy-environment (Lei, 1997/1999/2000/ 2003). All study is based on the marginal opportunity cost theory (Pearce, D.W. and A. Markandya, 1989) for natural resources pricing and Chinese National Accounting System's reform (CNSB, 1992/2002). 2. CHINESE INTEGRATED SYSTEM OF ENVIRONMENT-ECONOMY ACCOUNTING (CSEEA) In our CSEEA matrix, there are 27 rows which be divided into 7 parts (Opening Stocks (1 row), Use of Economy Natural Assets (8 rows), Supplies & Value Add (8 rows), Use of Non-Economy Natural Assets (5 rows), Green Value Add (1 row), Other Adjustments (3 rows) and Closing Stocks (1 row)) and 28 columns which be divided into 6 parts (Domestic Production (3 columns), Final Consumption (3 columns), Foreign Trade (3 columns), Economy Assets (14 columns), Non-Economy Assets (4 columns) and Total (1 column)). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».