MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2592990023 · doi:10.1097/01.cot.0000514199.12210.f5

Active Patients May Have Better Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Outcomes

2017· article· en· W2592990023 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kurt Samson

Notice bibliographique

RevueOncology Times · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCancer survivorship and care
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineColorectal cancerCancerInternal medicineGastrointestinal cancerClinical trialOncologyDiseaseChemotherapy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

colorectal cancer: colorectal cancerSAN FRANCISCO—Patients with metastasized colorectal cancer enrolled in a phase III chemotherapy trial had better survival and lower progression rates if they engaged in a half hour of moderate physical activity each day, according to an analysis of subjects conducted by the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. The investigators found a 19 percent reduction in mortality from any cause and a 16 percent reduction in cancer progression among patients who reported 30 or more minutes of moderate physical activity daily at the time they began chemotherapy. Spending 5 or more hours per day was associated with a 25 percent reduction in mortality. The link between physical activity and better outcomes has been repeatedly reported in studies involving patients with less advanced colorectal cancer, but this is the first time it has been shown in metastasized disease, explained Brendan J. Guercio, MD, in a press briefing during the ASCO 2017 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium (Abstract 659). The findings challenge the opinion that little is to be gained from exercise in metastatic colorectal cancer because the prognosis is so poor, he noted. Guercio was a medical student at Dana-Farber at the time the research was completed and is now a resident at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston. Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt, MD, Clinical Director of Dana-Farber's Gastrointestinal Cancer Center, is the study group chair and senior author. The researchers reported that greater walking duration and longer daily non-vigorous physical activity were associated with reduced risk of all-cause mortality, but no association was observed between walking pace or more vigorous exercise and better outcomes. “These findings suggest that it doesn't take a lot of physical activity to improve outcomes,” said Guercio. “While exercise is by no means a substitute for chemotherapy, patients can experience a wide range of benefits from as little as 30 minutes of exercise a day.” Methods, Results Guercio and his colleagues based their findings on self-reported daily exercise in 1,231 patients participating in the NCI-sponsored phase III CALGB 80405 trial for metastasized colorectal cancer. Each participant completed a questionnaire at the time they began chemotherapy that included their daily physical activity. The investigators then estimated total metabolic equivalent task (MET) hours per week to evaluate physical activity levels. The primary endpoint was overall survival while the secondary endpoint was progression-free survival. To minimize the effects of poor and rapidly declining health, patients were excluded if they experienced disease progression or died within 60 days of assessment. The data also was adjusted for known prognostic factors, comorbidity, weight loss over the previous 6 months, age, general health, other chronic illnesses, and type of cancer therapy received. Patients who were most physically active engaged in 18 or more MET hours per week, equal to at least 30 minutes of moderate activity each day, such as walking, cleaning, or gardening. The least physically active patients engaged in fewer than 3 MET hours per week. No association was observed between more vigorous physical activity and cancer outcomes. Overall, patients who spent more time being physically active had reduced rates of cancer progression and death. In a secondary exploratory analysis, more time spent in non-vigorous physical activity, such as walking or lawn mowing, was linked to improved survival. “This is important because a lot of colon cancer patients seek answers from their physician on whether lifestyle changes can impact outcomes,” said Guercio. The biggest question, given the observational nature of the study, is whether or not confounding health factors played a role, Guercio explained. “In other words, the question is: does physical activity make people healthier, or are individuals who are sicker than others just exercising less?” “Randomized controlled trials and more prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm the associations between physical activity and outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer,” Guercio noted. An ongoing randomized clinical trial is comparing patients who exercise during treatment and those who do not, and could provide additional data that physical activity leads to longer survival. Guercio added, “Patients should be encouraged by this. While the findings have to be replicated...moderate exercise is not likely to harm these patients and may yield other benefits.” Commentary Nancy Baxter, MD, PhD, of St. Michael's Hospital and the University of Toronto, who moderated the press conference, commented on the findings. “This study shows that even a small amount of exercise may make a big difference. I think this is something we can definitely recommend to our patients. This is an important addition to our armamentarium,” she said. “Physical activity can be difficult for patients with advanced colorectal cancer, but this study shows that even a small amount of exercise may make a big difference. It's important to help our patients find ways to incorporate moderate exercise into their daily lives—regardless of the stage of their disease.” Peter Campbell, PhD, Strategic Director of digestive system cancer research at the American Cancer Society, also noted the data are in-line with prior studies in colorectal cancer patients. “We've previously reported on a cohort of patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer, and increased physical activity seems to be associated with improved survival among these patients,” he told Oncology Times. “The main limitation to all of these data, however, is that the datasets are simply observational. That is, patients were not randomly assigned to an activity group or to a sedentary group.” Kurt Samson is a contributing writer.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,088
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,358
Écart entre enseignants0,331 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOncology TimesMême sujetCancer survivorship and careTravaux en français237 207