MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2593028431 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.1368.1368

TET2 Mutations Are Highly Associated with RUNX1-RUNX1T1 Translocations and NPMc+ in Childhood AML: a Report from Children's Oncology Group AAML03P1, AAML0531 and NCI/COG Target AML Initiative

2015· article· en· W2593028431 sur OpenAlexaff
Matthew A. Kutny, Todd A. Alonzo, Yi‐Cheng Wang, Rhonda E. Ries, Jason E. Farrar, Jaime M. Guidry Auvil, Malcolm A. Smith, Daniela S. Gerhard, Tanja M. Davidsen, Patee Gesuwan, Leandro C. Hermida, Marco A. Marra, Andrew J. Mungall, Richard A. Moore, William D. Long, Yussanne Ma, Stuart Zong, E. Anders Kolb, Alan S. Gamis, Soheil Meshinchi

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMissense mutationGemtuzumab ozogamicinMedicineFrameshift mutationNonsense mutationOncologyHepatoblastomaMutationPediatric cancerGeneticsInternal medicineCancer researchBiologyCancerGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abnormalities of epigenetic regulatory genes including DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2 and TET2 are common in adults with AML. The prevalence of these abnormalities appears to increase with older age, but their impact in pediatric AML is less certain. The Children's Oncology Group (COG) has previously reported that mutations of DNMT3A, IDH1 and IDH2 are very rare in pediatric patients (Ho et al Leukemia 2010; Ho et al Pediatric Blood and Cancer 2011). In the current study we examined the prevalence and prognostic significance of TET2 gene mutations in a large cohort of pediatric patients with AML. We screened for genomic mutations in the TET2 gene using DNA extracted from diagnostic specimens of 949 pediatric de novo AML patients treated on the COG studies AAML03P1 (N=226) and AAML0531 (N=723). The COG trial AAML03P1 was a phase III pilot study with non-random assignment to gemtuzumab ozogamicin in combination with multi-agent chemotherapy. AAML0531 was a phase III trial with randomization to gemtuzumab ozogamicin. The entire coding sequence of TET2 and was amplified and sequenced. Mutational data was correlated with clinical characteristics and outcome data in both univariable and multivariable analyses. Mutations of the TET2 gene were found in 26 of 949 samples (2.7%). Mutations were found across TET2 gene exons 3-11 from amino acid 121 to 1920. There were 14 missense mutations, 8 nonsense mutations, 2 insertion/deletion (in/del) resulting in frame shift and 2 samples with multiple mutations (1 with missense mutation and in/del frameshift; 1 with nonsense mutation and in/del frameshift). There was no significant difference in the age, gender, race or ethnicity of patients with or without TET2 mutations. Patients with TET2 mutations had a higher prevalence of normal cytogenetics than those without a TET2 mutation (44% vs. 22%, P=0.011). There was also a significant association of TET2 mutations with core binding factor leukemia, although the direction of the association differed between t(8;21) and inv(16). Patients with TET2 mutations compared to those without these mutations were more likely to have t(8;21) (53% vs. 17%, P= 0.021) but less likely to have inv(16) (0% vs. 21%, P=0.039). Molecular mutations currently used in risk stratification of pediatric AML were evaluated. There was no association with FLT3/ITD or mutations of CEBPA, but there was a strong association with NPMc+ which is known to confer a favorable prognosis. TET2 mutant patients had a 32% prevalence of NPMc+ compared to only 7% NPMc+ among TET2 non-mutant (P=<0.001). With cytogenetic and molecular data taken together, there was no difference in distribution of TET2 mutant patients among the 3 genetic risk groups utilized by the COG (Low Risk= t(8;21), inv(16), NPMc+, or CEBPA mutant; High Risk= Monosomy 7, Monosomy 5/del 5q, or FLT3/ITD; Standard Risk= all others). Comparing patients with and without TET2 mutations, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) (5 yr: 77% vs. 65%, P=0.194), event free survival (EFS) (5 yr: 58% vs. 50%, P=0.411) or relapse risk (40% vs. 37%, P=0.772). We performed multivariable analysis of OS and EFS for TET2 mutation status, risk grouping, NPMc+ status and treatment exposure to gemtuzumab ozogamicin. TET2 mutation status was not predictive of outcome in this multivariable analysis. However, genetic risk group was significantly associated with both OS and EFS and treatment with gemtuzumab ozogamicin was associated only with EFS (HR 0.824 for patients treated with gemtuzumab ozogamicin). Due to the strong association of TET2 mutation and NPMc+, we further evaluated Kaplan Meier estimates of EFS of the 4 groups of patients stratified by both TET2 mutation and NPMc+ status and determined that co-occurrence of TET2 mutation does not modify the clinical significance of NPMc+. (Figure 1) This study demonstrates that TET2 gene mutations are not common events in childhood AML but are highly associated with NPMc+ and may hint at potential cooperation of genetic and epigenetic factors that mediate myeloid leukemogenesis. The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the important contributions of the late Dr. Robert Arceci to the AML TARGET initiative. Disclosures Off Label Use: Arsenic Trioxide in pediatric patients with newly diagnosed APL. Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Pediatric AML..

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,276
Écart entre enseignants0,255 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research→Travaux en français237 207→