Assessment of Microrna Expression in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Using High Throughput Techniques
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) accounts for 3–10% of all lymphomas and demonstrates a poor clinical response to current therapeutic approaches, with a median survival of 3–5 years. The natural history of MCL is heterogeneous and not well-defined by standard clinical markers as patients may die within months of diagnosis or experience long-term survival. There remains a need for reliable biomarkers of MCL prognosis. To date, global gene expression signatures have not been determined for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) MCL samples due to difficulties isolating full-length mRNA transcripts from FFPE tissues. Examining microRNA expression in FFPE samples may circumvent this problem, as this population of RNAs remains intact during processing of FFPE samples. MicroRNAs (miRs) are small, non-coding RNAs, which regulate gene expression by inhibiting mRNA translation. Although miR expression signatures have been derived for other hematological malignancies, assessment of miR expression in patients with MCL has yet to be undertaken. We hypothesize that different pathological subtypes of MCL have unique miR expression signatures, distinct from miR expression profiles of other B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Our objectives were two-fold: To determine and validate miR expression in different pathological subtypes of MCL; and, To compare miR expression in MCL to other B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Total RNA was extracted from FFPE samples [17 conventional MCL, 11 blastoid MCL, 4 follicular lymphomas (Grades 1, 2, 3a, and 3b), 1 nodal marginal zone lymphoma, 1 small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL/CLL) and 3 benign, reactive lymph nodes (normal controls)] using the RecoverAll kit for FFPE tissues (Ambion). RNA was subjected to quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) for 365 miRs and 3 endogenous control small nucleolar RNAs to obtain miR expression profiles using the TaqMan Low Density Array (TLDA) v1.0 platform (MicroFluidic card, Applied Biosystems). TLDAs were run on the ABI7900 HT analyzer with TLDA upgrade and analysed with RQ Manager software provided by Applied Biosystems. Expression profiles were correlated to pathological subtype, and hierarchical clustering, principal component analysis (PCA), and ANOVA were performed using Partek software [Partek Genomics Suite for Gene Expression Data]. Results indicate that miR expression profiles differ between B-cell, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and MCL samples. Clustering analysis and PCA both demonstrated different profiles between MCL and B-cell, non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Although PCA did not demonstrate significant differences between the conventional and blastoid MCL samples, a set of fifteen miRs may be able to distinguish these two groups of MCL, since these 15 miRs are relatively upregulated in blastoid MCL in comparison to conventional MCL. In addition, PCA revealed five (3 conventional MCL samples and 2 blastoid samples), which did not cluster with their respective groups. These five samples were from patients known to have progressive disease, indicating that such patients may have different miR expression profiles compared to patients with non-progressive disease. We conclude that high-throughput miR expression profiles can be generated from FFPE samples in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas and that miR expression profiles for MCL samples differ from those of other B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Blastoid and conventional MCL samples may not have significantly differing profiles, however a set of 15 miRs appears to be able to distinguish between these two groups. Of note, samples from patients with known progressive disease have significantly different profiles from those with non-progressive disease.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».