MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2593255647 · doi:10.1182/blood.v114.22.410.410

Activation of Chloride Channels with the Anti-Parasitic Agent Ivermectin Induces Membrane Hyperpolarization and Cell Death in Leukemia Cells.

2009· article· en· W2593255647 sur OpenAlexaff
Sumaiya Sharmeen, Marko Škrtić, Mahadeo A. Sukhai, Joyce Sun, Rose Hurren, Marcela Gronda, Xiaoming Wang, Tabitha E. Wood, Robert A. Batey, Sonali Fonesca, Shana O. Kelley, Alessandro Datti, Jeffrey L. Wrana, Aaron D. Schimmer

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineImmunology and Microbiology
ThématiqueParasites and Host Interactions
Établissements canadiensMount Sinai HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLeukemiaClonogenic assayViability assayNiclosamideTrypan blueBiologyPharmacologyImmunologyChemistryCancer researchApoptosisBiochemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 410 FDA-approved drugs with previously unrecognized anti-cancer activity could be rapidly repurposed for this new indication. To identify such compounds, we compiled a library of known drugs with high maximal tolerated doses and well-known toxicity profiles. We screened this library in a dose-response manner in 4 leukemia cell lines to identify cytotoxic compounds as measured by the MTS assay. From these screens, we identified the anti-parasitic agent ivermectin (IVM) that induced cell death at low micromolar concentrations in all four leukemia lines tested. IVM is a derivative of avermecin B1 and licensed for the treatment of strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis parasitic infections, but also effective against other worm infestations (e.g., ascariasis, trichuriasis and enterobiasis). To evaluate the effects of IVM as a potential anti-cancer agent, leukemia and myeloma (n = 9) cell lines were treated with increasing concentrations of IVM. 72 hours after incubation, cell viability was determined by the MTS assay. IVM decreased the viability of 3/5 leukemia cell lines with an LD50 < 5uM and all other tested malignant cell lines with an LD50 < 10uM. Cell death was confirmed by Trypan blue staining and Annexin V staining. In clonogenic growth assays, 6uM IVM reduced clonogenic growth by ≥ 40% in 3/6 primary AML samples, but <15% in 3/3 samples of normal hematopoietic mononuclear cells. Given the effects of IVM in cell lines, we evaluated the drug in mouse models of leukemia. Here, K562, OCI-AML2, and MDAY-D2 leukemia cells were implanted subcutaneously into the flanks of sublethally irradiated NOD/SCID mice. One week after implantation, when the tumors were palpable, mice were treated with IVM at 3mg/kg/day by oral gavage or buffer control. Compared to control, IVM decreased tumor volume and weight in all 3 xenograft models by up to 72% without observable toxicity. Of note, a dose of 3mg/kg in mice translates to a dose of 0.24 mg/kg in humans based on scaling of body weight and surface area. This dose is readily achievable in human as patients routinely receive 0.2mg/kg for the treatment of parasitic disease and overdoses of up to 6g were not toxic. As an anti-parasitic, IVM binds and activates chloride ion channels, so we tested the effects of IVM on chloride flux in leukemia cells. OCI AML2 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of IVM and changes in intracellular chloride were measured using the fluorescent dye 6-methoxy-N-(3-sulfopropyl)quinolinium and flow cytometry. IVM increased intracellular chloride ion concentrations within 30 minutes of treatment. Chloride influx was accompanied by plasma membrane hyperpolarization within 1 hr of treatment, but no change in mitochondrial membrane potential was noted up to 24 hours after treatment. Plasma membrane hyperpolarization was dependent on chloride influx, as treatment with IVM in chloride-free media did not induce membrane hyperpolarization. Alternations in intracellular chloride and membrane hyperpolarization can lead to increased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation. Therefore, we measured changes in ROS after treatment with IVM. IVM (6uM) increased ROS generation in OCI-AML2 cells up to 2 ± 0.2 fold within 4 hours of treatment. Increased ROS generation appeared functionally important for IVM-induced cell death as pre-treatment with the antioxidant N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) inhibited IVM-induced cell death. Further supporting a mechanism of cell death related to increased ROS, IVM treatment increased expression of STAT1, IFIT3, OAS1, and TRIM22, members of the STAT1 signaling pathway that are known to be upregulated upon ROS generation. Cytarabine and daunorubicin are used in the treatment of AML and increase ROS production through mechanisms related to DNA damage. Therefore, we evaluated the combination of IVM and cytarabine and daunorubicin. By isobologram analysis, IVM synergized with cyatarabine (CI=0.51, 0.58, 0.65 at ED25, ED50, ED75, respectively) and daunorubicin (CI=0.48, 0.51, 0.54 at ED25, ED50, ED75, respectively). Thus, in summary, IVM activates chloride channels in leukemia cells leading to membrane hyperpolarization and increased ROS generation. In addition, it demonstrated preclinical activity in this disease at pharmacologically achievable concentrations. Therefore, IVM could be rapidly repurposed for the treatment of leukemia and highlights a potential new therapeutic strategy for this disease. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Ivermectin is an antiparasitic agent, licensed for the treatment of strongyloidiasis and onchocerciasis parasitic infections, but also effective against other worm infestations (e.g., ascariasis, trichuriasis and enterobiasis).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,115
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,260

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,233
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetParasites and Host InteractionsTravaux en français237 207