The Prevalence of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Individuals with Hemophilia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 4319 Background: Increasing life expectancy in individuals with hemophilia has lead to a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk (CV) factors and disease in this aging population. Clinical guidelines recommend screening patients as early as age 35 for hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, obesity and smoking and intervention to modify these risk factors. Antithrombotic agents (antiplatelet or anticoagulants) are beneficial in secondary prevention of CV events but no randomized controlled trials have studied these drugs in patients with hemophilia. The goal of this study was to identify the prevalence of CV risk factors and disease in patients with hemophilia over the age of 35, the use of antiplatelet agents and other drugs in the management of risk factors. Method: Retrospective chart review was conducted on all patients age 35 and older with Hemophilia A or B who attended the Southwestern Ontario Regional Hemophilia Program. This clinic services a population of approximately 1.5 million patients, following 139 patients with hemophilia A or B. Demographic information, severity of bleeding disorder, and CV risk factor and events were extracted from patient records as well therapeutic interventions and frequency of bleeding events. Result: A total of 46 out of 139 patients (33%), 37 with hemophilia A and 9 with hemophilia B, met inclusion criteria of age over 35. The majority of patients in this age group were classified as mild or moderate severity (40/46) based on factor levels (Factor VIII <0.01 = 4, Factor VIII >0.01–0.05 = 6, Factor VIII>0.06 = 27; Factor IX<0.01 = 2, Factor IX>0.01–0.05 = 6, Factor IX>0.06=1). Two patients had inhibitors, and 2 were on prophylaxis. Hypertension was identified in 22/46 (48%), dyslipidemia in 16/46 (35%), smoking in 16/46 (35%), and diabetes in 6/46 (13%). CV disease potentially requiring antithrombotic therapy for secondary prevention was identified in 5/46 patients (11%). Two had coronary artery disease, 1 had a transient ischemic attack, and 2 had atrial fibrillation. Of these patients, 2 patients underwent cardiovascular surgery for which they received factor replacement. One had an aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass graft. This patient did not receive any long-term antiplatelet treatment, but received heparin during surgery. The other patient underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with anticoagulation during the procedure, and received ASA and clopidogrel post-operatively, followed by ongoing ASA for 28 months. Of the remaining 3 patients with CV disease, 2 received ASA for 24 and 67 months. One patient received ASA after experiencing chest pain, but was discontinued after no underlying CV disease was found. No patients were given vitamin K antagonists. All 4 patients receiving antiplatelet agents were classified as mild (2) or moderate (2) hemophilia and no observed bleeding events were reported following the addition of these agents (median follow-up time 26 months, range 1–67 months). No factor prophylaxis was given while on long-term ASA. Conclusion: CV risk factors are prevalent in individuals with hemophilia and similar or higher to that reported in general population over age 35. Given the limited number of patients with CV disease in this study on antiplatelet agents, the safety of these drugs in patients with bleeding disorders cannot be determined. Although CV risk factors are prevalent in patients with hemophilia, the rarity, clinical heterogeneity and infrequent use of antithrombotic therapy suggest the need to develop a national or international registry to address the safety of these treatments for this population. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».