MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2594083434 · doi:10.1111/hojo.6_12196

Freedom is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine and the Foundations of a MovementAngela Y. Davis, edited by F. Barat. Chicago, IL.: Haymarket Books (2016) 158pp. $7.98pb ISBN 978‐1‐6‐8846‐564‐4

2017· article· en· W2594083434 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
­Bree Carlton

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Howard Journal of Crime and Justice · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOppressionManifestoPower (physics)PoliticsSociologyResistance (ecology)White (mutation)SituatedSocial movementMedia studiesState (computer science)Gender studiesPolitical scienceLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This new manifesto comprises an accessible and important collection of interview excerpts and political speeches dating between 2013 and 2015. In this book, Davis issues a profound challenge in appealing for an activist community and a sustained co-ordinated global movement of struggles for freedom. The collection, edited by Frank Barat, is marketed to activists to identify the interconnections between variously situated struggles against structural violence rooted in white supremacy, patriarchy, state power, capitalist markets, and imperialism, in order to build co-ordinated struggles towards social change. In his introductory reflections, Barat notes that his personal imperative in producing this collection with Davis was to pre-empt reflection and discussion of the experience of struggle entailed in activist work. The opportunity to exchange with Davis on this front is vital, not only because she is an iconic source of knowledge and inspiration. It is because, in his words, ‘she is still every day living the struggle. She is an embodiment of resistance’ (p.xx). Furthermore, her presence is reflected in, and inspiring to, many of the collective liberation movements that we see today and it has been reflected through her vocal participation in anticolonial struggles all over the world, including Palestine (p.xxi). Much of what is presented in this short text is not necessarily new. Davis has, in recent years, been very vocal in promoting the view that local and global struggles against oppression are connected and should be seen in this way. In Freedom is a Constant Struggle the conversations and speeches reach across a variety of significant moments in historical and political struggles in the United States and in other global regions: the struggle for liberation and freedom from state violence in Gaza, Palestine; the abolition of slavery; the proliferation of racialised criminalisation and punishment through policing and mass imprisonment; the shooting of Michael Brown, the Ferguson riots and the emergence of the Black Lives Matter Movements in the United States and in other jurisdictions such as Canada and Australia. There is also an overriding concern about reform and navigating the extent of investment activists make in the state as an avenue for achieving short-term institutional change. For example, she problematises the contemporary resurgence of carceral feminism and the limitations and risks in investing in the state and criminal justice as a measure for responding to heteropatriarchal violence in the community (pp.138–9). The common thread in Davis's analysis is to learn from, and identify, the connections in campaigns and movements against injustice past and present but also transnationally. This is because, she argues, seeing these connections enables our struggles to mature, to produce new ideas and new terrains on which we can engage in the quest for freedom (p.11). the site of the jail or prison is not only material and objective … it's ideological and psychic as well. We internalize the notion of a place to put bad people. That's precisely one of the reasons we have to imagine the abolitionist movement as addressing those ideological and psychic issues as well. Not just the process of removing material institutions. (p.22) This observation takes us back to our position in seeing and responding to the struggles across continuums of oppression and harm that span the community to the prison and are rooted in white supremacist heteropatriarchal capitalist violence. [while in Australia] we always go into the prison because a good portion of the leadership of the organisation is in prison. It's so easy to just forget, to think about the prison and its population abstractly. If you're serious about developing egalitarian relations, you will figure out how to make those connections. How to stay in touch with people behind bars. How to allow their voices to be heard. (p.27) This observation highlights another vital dimension of movement building that relies on meaningful and participatory solidarities developed with those communities who hold lived experience of injustice and oppression. what has kept me going has been the development of new modes of community. I don't know whether I would have survived, had not movements survived, had not communities of resistance, communities of struggle. So whatever I am doing I always feel myself directly connected to those communities … It is in collectivities that we find reservoirs of optimism. (p.49) This notion of a transnational activist community has been fostered by Davis's commitment to support abolitionist activist struggles and work outside the United States. My initial reaction was to disregard this work as a further collection of vignettes synthesising a life of activism. However, Angela Y. Davis should never be underestimated. What I value most about her work is its profundity and how her very simple observations have such broad transfer and relevance to struggles for freedom everywhere.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,359
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,300
Écart entre enseignants0,271 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2017
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Howard Journal of Crime and JusticeMême sujetJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesTravaux en français237 207