SRC within the Lin-CD34+CD38+/Lo Population Possess Heterogeneous Migration, Repopulation, and Self-Renewal Potential.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The SCID repopulating cell (SRC) xenotransplant assay is a powerful tool for characterizing human hematopoietic stem cells. Injection of hematopoietic cells directly into the intrafemoral (IF) cavity along with injection of a neutralizing antibody against residual murine NK cells and macrophages provides additonal improvements to the method (ASH 2004). IF injection permitted identification of a novel rapid-SRC (R-SRC) within the Lin-CD34+CD38+/Lo population that generated an erythromyeloid graft within 2 weeks post-transplant (Nat Med 2003). We found that this population also provides multi-lineage engraftment at 6 weeks post-transplant raising the question of whether the R-SRC had self-renewal potential. Lentivector-mediated clonal tracking was used to determine the self-renewal capacity of the individual cells within the Lin-CD34+CD38+/Lo population. Clonal analysis in primary recipients injected by IF with 5 x 10e4 Lin-CD34+CD38+/Lo and analyzed at 6 weeks showed that a subset of clones present in the injected femur were found in other bones, indicating that some individual SRC had self-renewed in the injected femur and migrated to other hematopoietic tissues. To directly test for self-renewal of migrating and non-migrating SRC, the original injected femur and the other bones (non-injected femur, two tibias and the pelvis) from each primary mouse was injected by IF into two individual secondary mice, respectively. 1) At 6 weeks post-transplant, each cell source produced substantial secondary grafts establishing that the Lin-CD34+CD38+/Lo population contains SRC with self-renewal potential. 2) Clonal analysis revealed heterogeneous self-renewal properties of individual SRC found in the primary mice; some made major contributions to all hematopoietic territories of secondary mice while others did not engraft secondary mice. 3) Interestingly, in some cases clones were detected in secondary mice that had been below detection in the primary mouse, suggesting that upon transplant into primary mice the SRC either did not divide or if they divided they returned to quiescence. Secondary transplantation was a stimulus for their activation to produce a graft of differentiated progeny. 4) Cases were observed where an active clone was found in a secondary mouse (transplanted from the primary injected femur) that had been below detection within the primary injected femur. However, the non-injected bones from this primary mouse as well as secondary mice derived from these bones all contained that same clone. We conclude that upon IF injection this SRC underwent self-renewal divisions and some of these progeny migrated to other bones and established a graft and also self-renewed, while in the injected bone the SRC likely returned to quiescence, only to be reactivated by secondary transplant. 5) Evaluation of two secondary recipients derived from one primary injected femur at 3 weeks when the graft is mainly myeloerythroid and at 6 weeks when it is mainly B cell and myeloid demonstrated that different lineage compositions were initiated by the same stem cell. The combination of clonal marking and IF injection provides an unprecedented insight into the earliest steps of stem cell function following transplantation. Although our clonal analysis is ongoing, it appears that rapid self-renewal and migration following IF injection represents a hallmark of a primitive subclass of SRC. It is essential to gain insight into the complex composition of the human stem cell compartment to develop effective stem cell-based therapies.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».