Characterization of the p.A1461D Mutation Causing Von Willebrand's Disease Type 2B with Severe Thrombocytopenia, Circulating Giant Platelets and Defective α -Granule Secretion
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 1074 Von Willebrand's disease type 2B (VWD2B) is a rare bleeding disorder characterized by enhanced binding of von Willebrand factor (VWF) to platelet GPIbα due to gain-of-function mutations clustering in the VWF A1 domain. Binding of mutated type-2B VWF to GPIbα on circulating platelets may result in spontaneous platelet agglutination and increased ADAMTS13-mediated proteolysis of bound VWF. Consequently, thrombocytopenia, loss of larger VWF plasma multimers, and increased agonist-induced platelet agglutination at low concentrations of ristocetin are typical findings in VWD2B. However, not all of these laboratory features must be present, and confirming a diagnosis of VWD2B can thus be a challenge. We describe the case of a first-time pregnant woman (MCMDM-1 bleeding severity score, 10) with hereditary thrombocytopenia (platelet count, 17 × 109/L) and spontaneous ex-vivo platelet aggregate formation, in whom previous testing for VWD2B had been inconclusive due to absent additional platelet agglutination at low concentrations of ristocetin. Therefore, platelet-type VWD caused by mutated GPIbα remained possible. Microscopic examination of the patient's peripheral blood smear revealed both small agglutinates of moderately enlarged and scattered single giant platelets. VWF:CB was 26% (normal, 50–250%), and VWF:Ag was 56% (50–160%), resulting in an abnormal activity to antigen ratio of 0.46 (0.8–1.2). Multimer analysis revealed loss of larger and intermediate sized VWF plasma multimers, and VWD2B was eventually diagnosed by identification of the mutation p.A1461D in the VWF A1 domain. Using an in-house ELISA, we assessed binding of recombinant wild-type (WT) and mutant VWF, respectively, to an immobilized GPIbα fragment in the absence and presence of increasing concentrations of ristocetin (0.3–1.5 mg/mL). Surprisingly, when compared to WT VWF in the presence of 1.5 mg/mL ristocetin (100%), binding of the p.A1461D mutant was already increased to 177% in the absence of ristocetin with only marginal additional binding evident at 1.5 mg/mL (238%). In comparison, binding of the p.V1316M mutant causative of VWD2B formerly described as the Montreal platelet syndrome, an inherited form of thrombocytopenia characterized by mucocutaneous bleeding and circulating giant platelets, was only 73% at 0 mg/mL ristocetin with significantly increased binding at 1.5 mg/mL (171%). Interestingly, ex-vivo stimulation of the patient's platelets with ADP or TRAP-6 resulted in only minimal surface CD62P expression, as analyzed by flow cytometry, while no CD62P was present on un-stimulated platelets, suggesting defective α -granule secretion. Similar findings were obtained on platelets from the patient's father and brother who also had severe thrombocytopenia and genetically confirmed VWD2B. Successful delivery of a healthy infant was achieved by only two peripartal doses of highly purified VWF concentrate in addition to systemic antifibrinolytics. In summary, this report further highlights the importance of genetic testing for the diagnostic work-up of suspected VWD2B, because the typical VWF activity pattern may not be present in all patients. Furthermore, our ELISA data demonstrate significant ristocetin-independent binding of the p.A1461D VWF mutant to platelet GPIbα, suggesting that the assay could be useful in differentiating VWD2B from platelet-type VWD in cases with severe thrombocytopenia and/or pronounced spontaneous platelet agglutination. Finally, our flow cytometry experiments support the concept of altered megakaryocytopoiesis and dysfunctional (pro)platelet production in VWD2B, which are likely due to adhesive intracellular interactions between mutated VWF and GPIbα and may result in concomitant α -storage pool disease. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».