Proceedings of the 22nd international workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It is with pleasure that we welcome you to Toronto, Canada, for the 22nd edition of the ACM Workshop on Network and Operating Systems Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV) from June 7-8, 2012. Similar to previous editions, the workshop covers topics in network and system support for multimedia, such as cloud and peer-to-peer system architectures, media streaming, distribution and storage support, multimedia communications and system security, multi-core and many-core architecture support, networked GPUs, graphics and virtual environments, networked games and real-time immersive systems, operating systems, middleware and network support for multimedia, Web 2.0 systems and social networks, as well as wireless networks and embedded systems for multimedia applications. In addition to reporting on the latest academic research in the field, NOSSDAV is also known for its fruitful discussions and for educating researchers about the views and needs of the industry, which have influenced the direction of many researchers who have attended the workshop in the past. This tradition of the mix of academic and industry views continues with NOSSDAV 2012, where we welcome our keynote speakers Dr. Ali C. Begen from Cisco Systems and Prof. Wu-chi Feng from Portland State University, who will keep us up-to-date with both the quickly changing reality of networked multimedia industry, as well as the latest developments in academic research in the field, respectively. NOSSDAV 2012 also provides a mixed industry-academia panel for discussions of the hottest research topics in network and system support for multimedia. NOSSDAV 2012 received 47 submissions from around the globe. As is common for high quality workshops, each paper was first reviewed by at least three reviews independently, and then the reviewers discussed the paper together and under the moderation of TPC chairs. Based on the results of both the reviewers' scores and the discussions, the papers were then ranked by the TPC chairs, and after careful considerations we accepted 17 papers for inclusion in the final NOSSDAV 2012 proceedings. We are very pleased with the overall quality of the final program, and we hope that researchers and practitioners in the field will benefit from and enjoy it as well.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle