Guest Editors' Comments
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This special issue is an outcome of seminar: Families and Memories arranged in Oslo, Norway, June 15-17, 2009. The seminar was part of annual seminars arranged by Committee on Family Research (CFR) in name of International Sociological Association (ISA). It was co-arrangement between CFR, Oslo University College (OUC) and Center for Studies of Holocaust and Religious Minorities (HL-center). The seminar took place at Villa Grande which hosts HL-center. It is place of great symbolic significance as it was private estate of perpetrator Vidkun Quisling, who headed Nazified government during German occupation of Norway 1940-1945.By combining two usually separate research topics/amzfei on one side and on other, we wanted to open up new direction of knowledge production. Family is much researched topic within social sciences. Although studies often focus on how experiences within are memorized and interpreted, concept of memory is not usually highlighted. Within memory research realm of family is quite natural place to study phenomena such as traditions and memory construction, but more as context for analyses than as an analytical and theoretical concept. Linking two areas, and memories, transcends disciplinary boundaries that often separate social sciences from humanities. By combining these two research traditions, we hoped to encourage new approaches that will increase our understanding.It started as an idea. By sending out call for papers, we experienced that also others saw combination of families and memories as interesting and we were overwhelmed by responses. We had hoped that our idea would create some interest, but we had not foreseen extent it actually did. We had to exclude several papers because of space limitations and ended up with 80 participants from 23 different countries from all five continents. In choosing participants, we took care of having different fields and traditions of research represented. This special issue: Families and Memories: Continuity and Social Change is first of two publications from seminar. The second publication, Holocaust as an Active Memory, is an anthology and will be published by Unipub publishing house later this year.This special issue focuses on social continuity and change, genuine perspective in sociology that is also crucially relevant in memory studies. It addresses question of how continuity and change is reflected in family memories. We tend to see not as mirror of but rather as products of processed past. The past as it was, will never reoccur exactly same way. However, through memory we bring past into present. In this respect this special issue is leaning on shoulders of George Herbert Mead, even though articles are not explicitly referring to him. According to Mead durations are a continual sliding of presents into each other (Mead, 1934, p. 334). And, the constitute earlier periods with future within it. The past is not an entity by itself. The reality of past will always be in present (Mead, 1934, ? 335). The past fluctuates like river where one can never step down in same river again. Memory is link between past as it once was and present. And when has passed, it also becomes past that can only be reached through memory.Modem theory of historical consciousness corresponds with Mead's way of thinking without making an explicit link. Jorn Rusen for instance considers memory and human existence as mode of being in time (Rusen, 2008, p. 3). Like Mead, Rusen sees past, present, and future as interlinked forming an existential framework of human activities. We approach past out of needs for orientation that emerge in our situation: by constructing meaningful patterns of historical experience we enable ourselves to develop future perspectives and frameworks for agency. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».