A Response to "The Return of the Dead in Margaret Atwood's Surfacing and Alias Grace"*
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
An arbitrary choice then, definitive moment: October 23, 1990. It's bright clear day, unseasonably warm. It's Tuesday [...]. sun moves into Scorpio, Tony has lunch at the Toxique with her two friends Roz arid Charis, sUght breeze blows in over Lake Ontario, and Zenia returns from the dead (RB 4).This quote is from Margaret Atwood's 1993 novel Robber Bride in which there is character, Zenia, that mysteriously comes back from the world of the dead that of the Uving. Burkhard Niederhoff makes very interesting and appropriate references various returns from the dead in Atwood's narrative prose, including Tent. Regarding her poetry, he notes stubborn refusal to be buried in Animals in that Country (1968) as well as Moodie's last meditations from underground, in Journals of Susanna Moodie's final poem (1970).The starting point of his discussion are three texts by Atwood, one work of fiction, namely Surfacing (1972), and two books of criticism, Survival, published in the same significant year, and much later text, Negotiating with the Dead: Writer on Writing (2002). Niederhoff proposes daring pair: Surfacing and Alias Grace (1996). Two works which have hardly ever been discussed together. two novels belong in fact very different periods within the Atwood canon, besides the span of more than twenty years that separates them. There are, however, interesting similarities as well as crucial differences between them that Niederhoff quite accurately points out.Given the prominence of the supernatural and ghostly presences in Niederhoff 's essay, it is important focus for moment on the novel I quoted above that, strangely enough, is not mentioned, namely TTie Robber Bride (1993). In this novel, Zenia's return from the underworld is pregnant part of the plot. She suddenly bursts on the scene into the streets of Toronto while the women whose lives she tried destroy - Roz, Tony and Charis - are having their usual monthly lunch at the Toxique in downtown Toronto.In Survival Atwood has noted with dismay that women in literature have generally been limited the role of ice women, earth mothers, or whores - all of whom have natural, rather than supernatural, powers (cf. Survival 199-206). Canadians, in general have been denied supernatural representation. In Canadian Monsters: Some Aspects of the Supernatural in Fiction (1977), included in her collection of essays, Second Words, Atwood observes that magic and monsters don't usually get associated with literature [...]. Supernaturalism is not typical of prose fiction; the mainstream [...] has been solidly social-realistic. When people in fiction die, which they do fairly often, they usually stay buried (230). In addition, has traditionally been portrayed as a dull place, devoid of romantic interest and rhetorical excess, with not enough blood spilled on the soil make it fertile, and above all, ghostless (231).Donna Potts has in various ways underlined that, in Robber Bride, [throughout the text, Atwood's many references witches, vampires, monsters, and ghosts also affirm the presence of the supernatural in Canada (Potts 283). If we consider this in the light of literary tradition that Atwood herself tried define, the ghostly, flickering presence of Zenia acquires further significance. As early as in Survival Atwood had repeatedly emphasized the urgency to explore the possibilities of given tradition or pattern (174): A tradition doesn't necessarily exist bury you: it can also be used as material for new departures (246).The wicked and 'monstrous' Zenia returns unannounced into the world of the Uving much the bewUderment of the three protagonists. It is only at the very end of the novel that she definitively dies, this time with her ashes dispersed by Tony, Charis and Roz over Lake Ontario. Then again the figure of Zenia herseU could be trick of the imagination, ghost, spirit: The story of Zenia is insubstantial, ownerless, rumor only [. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».