MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2595988026 · doi:10.1086/690778

Jason Sean Ridler. <i>Maestro of Science: Omond McKillop Solandt and Government Science in War and Hostile Peace, 1939–1956</i>. xv + 350 pp., figs., tables, bibl., index. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015. $55 (cloth).

2017· article· en· W2595988026 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueIsis · 2017
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueHistory of Science and Medicine
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGovernment (linguistics)Index (typography)State (computer science)World War IISpanish Civil WarHistoryPolitical scienceMedia studiesSociologyLibrary scienceLawPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Previous articleNext article FreeJason Sean Ridler. Maestro of Science: Omond McKillop Solandt and Government Science in War and Hostile Peace, 1939–1956. xv + 350 pp., figs., tables, bibl., index. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2015. $55 (cloth).Eric L. MillsEric L. Mills Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUSFull Text Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreAt the outset, Jason Ridler tells us that “the history of government science in Britain and Canada could not be told without the legacy of Omond Solandt” (p. 19). This is not hyperbole, for Solandt, although little known now, was an increasingly important figure in the development of defense science in Britain and Canada from the beginning of World War II through the Cold War period. Later he took on a series of varied and important tasks for industry and government in Canada, with less visibility but significant importance, such as research for Canadian National Railways and consulting with the committee investigating the Ocean Ranger oil rig disaster of 1982. Maestro of Science gives us a detailed and meticulously researched view of an administrative virtuoso at work and provides background to the state of science in Britain, Canada, and the United States that is relevant to present-day science policy.Omond Solandt (1909–1983) was born in Manitoba but raised mainly in Toronto in a Congregationalist family. His university career, aimed at medicine, involved training in physiology at the University of Toronto, eventually under the influence of the eminent Charles Best. Best directed Solandt to Cambridge, where he appeared to be destined for a career in clinical medicine and teaching. But World War II intervened, and, like many other academics, Solandt threw himself into the war effort, first as the director of a blood transfusion clinic in the London area; then, as his extraordinary talents for getting results were recognized, as leader of a group studying the operational aspects of tank warfare; and ultimately as superintendent of the British Army’s Operational Research Group, involved in many other aspects of defense research. As the war ended, Solandt, the only Canadian, joined a group designated by the British War Office to visit Japan and report on the effects of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki atomic bombs. In 1945, when the Canadian government looked for a leader of its prospective defense research establishment, he returned to Canada, becoming chairman of the Defence Research Board of Canada (DRB) when it was formally established in 1947. Until his retirement from the DRB in 1956, Solandt was involved in developing and administering nearly all aspects of Canada’s defense research, including the potential outcomes of atomic warfare, radar detection of incoming Soviet bombers and, later, ICBMs, the use of chemical and biological weapons, and the development of Canadian guided missiles and supersonic aircraft. His influence within the Canadian government was considerable, and he developed and maintained important links with Britain and the United States, capitalizing on his long-established contacts in Britain as well as making new ones in the United States.In a comprehensive and insightful introduction, Ridler explores the advantages and disadvantages of a biographical approach to a career as complex and unusual as Solandt’s, making the case that the combination of his intellect, training, and practical abilities outweighs the consequent de-emphasis of attention to organizations and broader events. In this case, I think that Ridler has made the right choice in his approach to such a noteworthy—and exceptionally effective—figure, giving us a very clear view of the successes and failures of a talented scientist-administrator. This is not to say that some disadvantages do not accrue to his approach. Organizations and people do tend to appear abruptly, only to disappear without a trace. The significance of some scientific organizations and many political events is sometimes not clear. Some technical problems, although minor, could have been corrected by the usually impeccable University of Toronto Press during the reviewing and proof stages of production. Among these flaws, many of Solandt’s associates appear without first names or initials. Acronyms are rife, and not all are listed in an otherwise helpful guide. A few organizations are misnamed. The index is woefully short and totally unsatisfactory.Technical flaws aside, this book is an important contribution to our knowledge of how some branches of science—notably defense science—developed during and after World War II in the hands of a master administrator. This period does not lack its literature, but Ridler’s approach, examining in detail the career of one important player, Omond Solandt, a Canadian whose career spanned the Atlantic and came to take in the United States as well, provides fascinating insight into a fine-grained history—the experiences of a scientist-administrator balancing the demands of research and the political imperatives of the wartime and postwar worlds. Notes Eric L. Mills is Professor Emeritus of History of Science, Dalhousie University, and Inglis Professor, University of King’s College, Halifax. He works on the history of oceanography and on the history of marine sciences in Canada. Previous articleNext article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Isis Volume 108, Number 1March 2017 Publication of the History of Science Society Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/690778 © 2017 by The History of Science Society. All rights reserved.PDF download Crossref reports no articles citing this article.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,528
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,006
Communication savante0,0000,002
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,236
Écart entre enseignants0,221 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle