Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Violence against women is a global problem, which can be recognized in every society and culture. Both in Canada and Finland the research about violence against immigrant women has begun quite recently and therefore, there is still a lot we do not know about this phenomenon and thus a demand for research. Immigrant women face unique circumstances and are in a vulnerable position of being abused. They are not a homogeneous group, on the contrary, they have individual life experiences but they all have been born outside the country of immigration and are so part of the minority. Family violence is a gendered issue even though many researchers tend to use neutral terms and so to let the readers understand that both men and women can be equally violent. The reality is, nonetheless, unbalanced and it has been suggested that ”family violence” should be called ”male violence” since males are largely responsible for most of the domestic violence. This is the reason why in this thesis I focus only in the abuse against women, and especially against immigrant women.\n\nMy main question for this thesis is: what are the societal risk factors which make immigrant women vulnerable to partner violence. I believe that knowing an answer to this question might make it possible to help abused immigrant women in better way and gives information about what kind of changes should be done in the society so that immigrant women could free themselves from violence. To get more information about the topic I interviewed abused immigrant women and the workers who meet these women every day. I have used four major themes: racism, immigration status, social welfare and legal systems and collision of the cultures and built a semi-structured interview around them. The interviews were done in Canada but I write from a Finnish perspective so that the gained information could be used in Finland.\n\nThe literature review and interview data describe quite similar risk factors and reasons for abuse. A big difference between Canada and Finland is that the education and knowledge of those workers who work with immigrant women: in Canada there is a lot more experience and training about immigration issues. Finland has less immigrants and the awareness of the special needs of immigrants is quite new. There is a lack of culturally sensitive services and in my opinion, to improve the situation culturally sensitive work should be taught already during the social work university studies.\n\nAsiasanat:partner abuse, immigrant women, Canada, society, risk factors
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».