Building Process Safety Culture-A Practical Implementation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract This paper presents a real-implementation example of how leaders at all levels of the organization work in unison to build a process safety culture in complex and very diverse operations. The process safety culture of this organization comprises the beliefs, attitudes and work practices from senior management to the front-line operations supervisor, field engineer and most importantly to the operator level. ConocoPhillips Indonesia (COPI) Business Unit has been implementing a process that engages people from all levels of the functional organization through a purposeful process safety management review approach. At the top of the hierarchy of this process safety management review approach, COPI has formed a Process Safety Board comprised of the operations vice president, senior managers from operations, engineering and HSE. In the middle of the hierarchy, COPI has established Process Safety Council composed of process safety engineers and engineering managers. COPI also assigns Process Safety Coaches who interface daily with operators in the field. This paper focuses on the process safety management review, which is conducted at the Process Safety Board level to continually build the appropriate process safety culture within the organization. The COPI Leadership Team actively participates in the business unit process safety culture and engages both occupational safety and process safety issues through Process Safety Board meetings, which are attended by the next layer of the process safety management team, Process Safety Council, and representatives from operations including Process Safety Coaches (Figures 1-3). Process safety leading indicators are reviewed during the board meeting. The review of the leading indicators does more than the checking of procedures and process safety training statistics. The Leadership Team also evaluates the leading indicators at the bottom, and all levels, of the process safety pyramid to drive process safety performance. The building of the process safety culture effort is recognized after board members and others demonstrate their commitment to the process and equally value process safety as occupational safety and operational activities. Through this review approach, process safety events and issues garner appropriate attention from all levels of the organization, and help COPI to continually support an appropriate process safety culture. Figure 1 Process Safety Board Members Figure 2 Process Safety Council Members Figure 3 Process Safety Coach Members This paper does not present novel improvements to process safety management, but provides structural information to commit, engage, understand, and support a developing sustainable process safety culture.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».