Design and Optimization of a Bacterial Sensor Based on the Innate Immune System
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The rapid and accurate detection of bacteria is of great concern in both clinical and defence settings. However, to date, the gold standard in the detection of bacteria remains the method of culturing bacteria in a laboratory setting. This process is slow and laborious, often taking multiple days before confirmation is given. This delay between presentation and identification is detrimental in both settings, as patients could go untreated or, in the case of biological terrorism or warfare, many potential victims could be exposed to a pathogen. As such, there is a need for the development of a rapid and sensitive detection system capable of identifying the presence of bacteria outside of a clinical laboratory. In the human body, this function is fulfilled by the innate immune system, which responds to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that are present on broad classifications of biological threats. For example, Toll-Like Receptor-4 (TLR-4), a pattern recognition receptor in the innate immune system, responds to the presence of lipopolysaccharide, the PAMP displayed on Gram-negative bacteria. As Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria can be treated with different antibiotics, even this broad distinction can be medically relevant. TLR-4 and the other proteins in the Toll-Like Receptor family have recently been studied for their use in biosensors1–5, and have shown great promise in being able to rapidly differentiate classes of bacteria and other biological threat agents. One major advantage over aptamer or antibody based sensors is that the user does not need to know what the biological agent is. Instead, the sensor can be used as a broad screening tool. This is especially true for the use of electrochemically based Toll-Like Receptor sensors, where the protein is attached to a surface via a linker, such as a self-assembled monolayer (SAM). However, these sensors have relied almost exclusively on the presence of relatively high resistance (> 1 kΩ) systems that provide small signals that are ill-suited to implementation outside of a laboratory1. To address this deficiency, we sought to optimize a TLR-4/SAM-based biosensor. Towards this aim, we have built upon previous work in which TLR-4 is oriented in a bio-mimicking fashion on a Au electrode surface1. The protein was tethered to a Ni2+-nitrilitriacetic acid (NTA) functional group, covalently attached to the end of a carboxyl-terminated thiol-based SAM. Various SAMs were explored in this work, ranging from long-chain single-component monolayers to tripartite SAMs containing multiple functional groups. An optimal ratio of thiol components was determined, based on the TLR-4 sensor response to the presence of Gram-negative bacteria, while remaining insensitive to the presence of Gram-positive bacteria or viral particles, with all samples presenting ≤1 kΩ of interfacial resistance to the rectification reaction. This represents a marked decrease in resistance compared to the current state-of-the-art for TLR-based sensors, providing a convenient avenue for future studies. 1. Mayall, R. M., Renaud-Young, M., Chan, N. W. C. & Birss, V. I. An electrochemical lipopolysaccharide sensor based on an immobilized Toll-Like Receptor-4. Biosens. Bioelectron. 87, 794–801 (2017). 2. Amini, K., Chan, N. W. C. & Kraatz, H.-B. Toll-like receptor 3 modified Au electrodes: an investigation into the interaction of TLR3 immobilized on Au surfaces with poly(I:C). Anal. Methods 6, 3322 (2014). 3. She, Z. et al. Investigation of the utility of complementary electrochemical detection techniques to examine the in vitro affinity of bacterial flagellins for a toll-like receptor 5 biosensor. Anal. Chem. 150222112048003 (2015). doi:10.1021/ac5042439 4. Amini, K. & Kraatz, H.-B. Toll-like receptors for pathogen detection in water: challenges and benefits. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 7319, 1–9 (2016). 5. Yeo, T. Y. et al. Electrochemical endotoxin sensors based on TLR4/MD-2 complexes immobilized on gold electrodes. Biosens. Bioelectron. 28, 139–145 (2011).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».